Background: This retrospective comparative study was performed to evaluate the clinical outcomes after surgical treatment for Bosworth fracture-dislocation, and to analyse the prognostic factors related to postoperative outcomes.

Methods: Fifteen patients were followed for ≥2 years after Bosworth fracture-dislocation. Twenty-five ankle fracture-dislocations as control group were enrolled to compare clinical outcomes. Clinical evaluation consisted of the AOFAS and Olerud-Molander scores. Patient and injury factors were analysed to identify the outcome predictors.

Results: There were no significant differences in either clinical evaluation score as compared to control group (P=0.245, .302, respectively). The time interval to operation and number of manual reduction attempts were found to be predictive factors for poor outcomes (P=0.004, .038, respectively).

Conclusion: As compared to more common patterns of ankle fracture-dislocations, intermediate-term clinical outcomes after Bosworth fracture-dislocations were statistically comparable. Delayed surgical reduction and repeated attempts at closed reduction appear to be negative outcome predictors.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2018.05.005DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical outcomes
16
prognostic factors
8
intermediate-term clinical
8
outcomes bosworth
8
bosworth fracture-dislocation
8
ankle fracture-dislocations
8
control group
8
clinical evaluation
8
clinical
6
outcomes
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!