A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Blood loss and cost-effectiveness of oral vs intravenous tranexamic acid in primary total hip arthroplasty: A randomized clinical trial. | LitMetric

Blood loss and cost-effectiveness of oral vs intravenous tranexamic acid in primary total hip arthroplasty: A randomized clinical trial.

Thromb Res

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, West China Hospital, West China Medical School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 610041, China. Electronic address:

Published: November 2018

Background: To assess the blood loss and cost-effectiveness of the oral and intravenous (IV) administration of tranexamic acid (TXA) for the treatment of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods: From January 2017 to August 2017, 100 patients undergoing primary THA were enrolled and randomly divided into two groups. In the oral TXA group (N = 50), 1 g of TXA (2 tablets of 500 mg) was given 2 h before the incision, and the same dose was repeated 3 h and 6 h postoperatively. In the IV TXA group (N = 50), 1 g of TXA was administered 10 min before the incision, and the same dose was repeated 3 h and 6 h postoperatively. The total follow-up period was 6 months.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in total blood loss (863.3 ± 272.5 mL and 886.1 ± 200.2 mL, P = 0.66), maximum Hb drop (2.9 ± 0.6 g/dl and 3.1 ± 0.8 g/dl, P = 0.17), maximum Hct drop (7.4 ± 2.1% and 7.7 ± 1.8%, P = 0.48), transfusion rates (1 and 2, P = 1.00) and transfusion units (1.5 u and 3 u, P = 0.56) between the two groups. However, the costs of TXA in the oral group were significantly lower than those in the IV TXA group (¥600 and ¥3150, P < 0.01). There was no difference in the Hb levels on postoperative days 1 and 3. No significant differences were found for operating time, hospital length of stay, DVT and/or PE, and wound complications in the postoperative follow-up.

Conclusions: The study demonstrated that the oral and IV administration of TXA in patients undergoing THA was proved to be an equivalent and effective method in reducing blood loss and transfusion rates. However, oral TXA is more cost-effectiveness than IV TXA, and it may be an alternative to the IV form.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2018.10.006DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

blood loss
12
txa group
12
loss cost-effectiveness
8
cost-effectiveness oral
8
oral intravenous
8
tranexamic acid
8
primary total
8
total hip
8
hip arthroplasty
8
group n = 50
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!