Correlation of transforming growth factor β-1 vitreous levels with clinical severity of proliferative vitreoretinopathy in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Objective: To correlate the vitreous concentration of transforming growth factor β-1 (TGF β-1) with the degree of clinical severity of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR).

Design: A prospective, observational, cross-sectional study carried out on cases and controls.

Participants: The study included 40 patients with a diagnosis of PVR secondary to rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Methods: Vitreous was obtained in patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy by rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, who were treated during the period from August 2015 to June 2016, in a national reference centre for ophthalmological care in Mexico City, Mexico. The levels of TGFβ-1 were quantified by ELISA technique. An ANOVA test was performed for the comparison of the different groups, together with a post-hoc Dunns test. A statistically significant difference was considered when obtaining P <.05.

Results: The levels of TGFβ-1 were quantified, and the following means were found for each group: In the group with PVR grade A, 1150.6 ± 452.08 pg / ml, PVR grade B: 1129.6 ± 365.54 pg / ml, and PVR grade C: 1146.4 ± 330.21 pg / ml. The statistical analysis did not find significant differences when comparing the different PVR groups. (P=.53). However, when performing the differential analysis for each level of severity, a statistically significant increase in the expression of TGFβ-1 was observed in the group of patients with PVR-A at a greater number of days of evolution of the detachment. (P=.03). There were no statistically significant differences for PVR-B and PVR-C (P=.16 and P=.16, respectively).

Conclusion: Although the levels of TGFβ-1 are not directly related to the clinical severity grade, suggesting that there must be other factors involved in the advanced stages of PVR, TGFβ-1 may have greater relevance during the initial stages of the clinical course by promoting the epithelial-mesenchymal transition due to its greater expression in PVR-A. Thus, it can be concluded that each isoform plays a very particular role in the complex process of PVR.