Prospective Validation of a Standardized Ultrasonography-Based Ovarian Cancer Risk Assessment System.

Obstet Gynecol

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Regional Women's Health, and Regional Imaging, The Permanente Medical Group, Walnut Creek, and the Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California.

Published: November 2018

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess a standardized system for evaluating ovarian cancer risk from ultrasound findings in average-risk women.
  • A total of 43,606 women were surveyed, with 16% showing abnormal adnexal masses, revealing varying cancer risk levels based on predefined categories.
  • The findings indicated that the standardized reporting helped in effectively stratifying risk, with the majority of women having low risk, which aids clinicians in making management decisions.

Article Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the performance of a system that standardizes ovarian cancer risk assessment and reporting on ultrasonography.

Methods: We conducted a prospective community-based cohort study of average-risk women undergoing ultrasonography in 2016 using a reporting system that requires adnexal masses to be categorized as 1, 2, 3, or X based on standardized ultrasound criteria including size, presence of solid components, and vascularity assessed by Doppler. With a median follow-up of 18 months, the risk of ovarian cancer or borderline tumor diagnosis for each category was determined.

Results: Among 43,606 women undergoing ultrasonography, 6,838 (16%) had an abnormal adnexal mass reported: 70% were category 1, 21% category 2, 3.7% category 3, and 5.4% category X. Among these women, 89 (1.3%) were subsequently diagnosed with ovarian cancer and 59 (0.9%) with borderline tumors. The risks of ovarian cancer diagnosis associated with masses reported as categories 1, 2, 3, and X were 0.2% (95% CI 0.05-0.3%), 1.3% (95% CI 0.7-1.9%), 6.0% (95% CI 3.0-8.9%), and 13.0% (95% CI 9.5-16.4%), respectively; risks of either ovarian cancer or borderline tumor were 0.4% (95% CI 0.2-0.6%), 2.3% (95% CI 1.6-3.1%), 10.4% (95% CI 6.6-14.1%), and 18.9% (95% CI 14.9-23.0%) respectively. Among 36,768 (84%) women with normal or benign adnexal findings reported, 38 women were diagnosed with ovarian cancer, for a risk of 0.1% (95% CI 0.07-0.14%).

Conclusion: In a community-based setting with low ovarian cancer prevalence, our standardized reporting system differentiated adnexal masses into four categories with distinct levels of risk with 9-10% of women having higher risk masses and 70% of women having masses associated with a risk of cancer similar to that of normal ultrasound findings. The system supports risk-based management by providing clinicians a more consistent assessment of risk based on ultrasound characteristics.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002939DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ovarian cancer
32
cancer risk
12
cancer
9
95%
9
ovarian
8
risk
8
risk assessment
8
women undergoing
8
undergoing ultrasonography
8
reporting system
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!