Introduction: There is still controversy regarding the bio-enhanced non-reconstructive ACL treatment.

Materials And Methods: A search for articles in databases was performed in February 2017. The objective and subjective evaluations of clinical studies and biomechanical and histological data of preclinical studies were extracted.

Results: Eighteen articles were included for analysis. In clinical studies, although subjective scores were significantly improved, the rate of re-operation rate was high. In preclinical studies, bio-enhancing techniques demonstrated promotion of the healing of ACL.

Conclusions: The efficacy of biological enhancement cannot be validated in clinical studies. Preclinical studies showed improved biomechanical and healing potential.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6170796PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asmart.2018.04.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

preclinical studies
16
clinical studies
12
biological enhancement
8
studies
7
non-reconstructive treatment
4
treatment complete
4
complete acl
4
acl tear
4
tear biological
4
clinical
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!