Efficacy of l-Ornithine l-Aspartate for the Treatment of Hepatic Encephalopathy and Hyperammonemia in Cirrhosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

J Clin Exp Hepatol

Liver Intensive Therapy Unit, Institute of Liver Sciences, Division of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Kings College London, United Kingdom.

Published: September 2018

Background/objectives: l-Ornithine l-Aspartate (LOLA) is a mixture of two endogenous amino acids with the capacity to fix ammonia in the form of urea and/or glutamine. Its' efficacy for the treatment of Hepatic Encephalopathy (HE), a known hyperammonemic disorder, remains the subject of debate. This study quantitatively analyzed the efficacy of LOLA in patients with cirrhosis and HE.

Methods: Efficacy was defined as the extent of lowering of blood ammonia and improvement of mental state assessed in clinically overt HE (OHE) by Westhaven criteria or psychometric testing for assessment of Minimal HE (MHE). Appropriate keywords were used for electronic and/or manual searches of databases to identify RCTs for inclusion. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using the Jadad Composite Scale together with The Cochrane Scoring Tool. Random Effects Models were used to express pooled Risk Ratio (RR) or Mean Difference (MD) with associated 95% Confidence Intervals (CI).

Results: 10 RCTs (884 patients) were included. Regression analysis showed no evidence of publication bias or other small study effects. Eight RCTs had low risk of bias by Jadad/Cochrane criteria. Comparison with placebo/no intervention controls revealed that LOLA was significantly more effective for improvement of mental state in all types of HE (RR 1.36 (95% CI 1.10-1.69),  = 0.005), OHE (RR: 1.19, 95% CI of 1.01-1.39, test for overall effect:  = 2.14,  = 0.03), MHE (RR: 2.15 (1.48-3.14),  < 0.0001) and for lowering of blood ammonia (MD: -17.50 μmol/l (-27.73 to (-7.26)),  = 0.0008). Improvement of mental state was greater in trials with low risk of bias. Heterogeneity was reduced in trials from Europe or with >100 participants. Oral LOLA appeared particularly effective for the treatment of MHE.

Conclusion: LOLA appears to improve mental state and lower ammonia in patients with HE or MHE. Further studies are required in some subgroups of HE and in the era of HE reclassification.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6175748PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jceh.2018.05.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mental state
12
l-ornithine l-aspartate
8
treatment hepatic
8
hepatic encephalopathy
8
improvement mental
8
risk bias
8
lola
5
efficacy
4
efficacy l-ornithine
4
l-aspartate treatment
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death for women in the United States, and U.S. female Veterans have higher rates of CVD compared to civilian women.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This pilot, exploratory project examined the relationship among the health, work, and social support of university housekeepers. The first objective was to examine the influence of social support on work-related outcomes among university housekeepers. The secondary objective was to examine the influence of social support on physical and psychological health among housekeepers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Overweight and obesity are critical public health concerns with relevance to U.S. military personnel, as active duty service members must meet physical fitness and body composition standards.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Implementation and hybrid effectiveness-implementation trials aspire to speed the translation of science into practice by generating crucial evidence for improving the uptake of effective health interventions. By design, they pose unique recruitment and retention challenges due to their aims, units of analysis, and sampling plans, which typically require many clinical sites (i.e.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: The diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis should be based on the best available evidence. Emphasising the risk of bias, the pyramid of evidence has the double-blind, randomised controlled trial and its meta-analyses on top. After the grading of all evidence by a group of experts, clinical guidelines are formulated using well-defined rules.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!