According to standard linguistic theory, the meaning of an utterance is the product of conventional semantic meaning and general pragmatic rules on language use. We investigate how such a division of labor between semantics and pragmatics could evolve under general processes of selection and learning. We present a game-theoretic model of the competition between types of language users, each endowed with certain lexical representations and a particular pragmatic disposition to act on them. Our model traces two evolutionary forces and their interaction: (i) pressure toward communicative efficiency and (ii) transmission perturbations during the acquisition of linguistic knowledge. We illustrate the model based on a case study on scalar implicatures, which suggests that the relationship between underspecified semantics and pragmatic inference is one of coevolution.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6586156 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12681 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Pama-Nyungan grandparent systems change with grandchildren, but not cross-cousin terms or social norms.
Evol Hum Sci
June 2020
Department of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UU, UK.
Kinship is a fundamental and universal aspect of the structure of human society. The kinship category of 'grandparents' is socially salient, due to grandparents' investment in the care of the grandchildren as well as to older generations' control of wealth and cultural knowledge, but the evolutionary dynamics of grandparent terms has yet to be studied in a phylogenetically explicit context. Here, we present the first phylogenetic comparative study of grandparent terms by investigating 134 languages in Pama-Nyungan, an Australian family of hunter-gatherer languages.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCoevolution of Lexical Meaning and Pragmatic Use.
Cogn Sci
November 2018
Institute for Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück.
According to standard linguistic theory, the meaning of an utterance is the product of conventional semantic meaning and general pragmatic rules on language use. We investigate how such a division of labor between semantics and pragmatics could evolve under general processes of selection and learning. We present a game-theoretic model of the competition between types of language users, each endowed with certain lexical representations and a particular pragmatic disposition to act on them.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFModeling Coevolution between Language and Memory Capacity during Language Origin.
PLoS One
June 2016
Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Memory is essential to many cognitive tasks including language. Apart from empirical studies of memory effects on language acquisition and use, there lack sufficient evolutionary explorations on whether a high level of memory capacity is prerequisite for language and whether language origin could influence memory capacity. In line with evolutionary theories that natural selection refined language-related cognitive abilities, we advocated a coevolution scenario between language and memory capacity, which incorporated the genetic transmission of individual memory capacity, cultural transmission of idiolects, and natural and cultural selections on individual reproduction and language teaching.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAdaptive Communication: Languages with More Non-Native Speakers Tend to Have Fewer Word Forms.
PLoS One
March 2016
Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Explaining the diversity of languages across the world is one of the central aims of typological, historical, and evolutionary linguistics. We consider the effect of language contact-the number of non-native speakers a language has-on the way languages change and evolve. By analysing hundreds of languages within and across language families, regions, and text types, we show that languages with greater levels of contact typically employ fewer word forms to encode the same information content (a property we refer to as lexical diversity).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!