Introduction: Pit and fissures are approximately eight times vulnerable than the smooth surface caries lesion. Sealants are effective in preventing, arresting, and progression of pit-and-fissure occlusal caries lesions. The failure of sealant resin-based retention is mainly attributed to the moisture contamination. To overcome this drawback, UltraSeal XT hydro, a moisture-friendly sealant, has been introduced.
Aim: This study aimed to compare and evaluate the retention, cariostatic effect, and discoloration of conventional Clinpro™ 3M™ ESPE™ and hydrophilic UltraSeal XT sealants among 12 to 15-year-old schoolchildren for 3 months.
Materials And Methods: A single-blinded, randomized, split-mouth clinical trial was conducted among thirty schoolchildren aged 12-15 years. Sealants used in the present study were Group I - Clinpro™ and Group II - UltraSeal XT hydro. Sealants were provided in the school by two operators based on the computer-generated random sequence and the study participants were evaluated after 3 months for sealant coverage, caries incidence, and discoloration using Color, Coverage and Caries sealant evaluation system. Sealant coverage between the two sealants was compared using Mann-Whitney U-test and Z-test for proportions.
Results: A total of 47 teeth (78.3%) with UltraSeal XT Hydro had the sealant covering in all the fissures compared to Clinpro™ 3M™ ESPE™ which was 46.7% (28 teeth) and the difference was observed to be statistically significant.
Conclusion: Hydrophilic UltraSeal XT Hydro yielded better sealant coverage (retention) compared to the conventional Clinpro™ 3M™ ESPE™. No difference was observed with regard to cariostatic effect and discoloration.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6169278 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_132_18 | DOI Listing |
Dent Med Probl
August 2024
Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Terna Dental College, Navi Mumbai, India.
Background: Pit and fissure sealants are the most commonly used preventive measure against caries in permanent molars. Advancements in dental materials have led to the development of hydrophilic sealants. However, their clinical efficacy must be evaluated and compared with that of conventional hydrophobic sealants.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Pediatr Dent
July 2024
Pediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, 21589 Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
This clinical trial aimed to evaluate and compare the retention and cariostatic effects of hydrophilic and hydrophobic resin-based sealants (RBSs) for sealing pits and fissures in the permanent molars of uncooperative children. A split-mouth and double-blind randomized clinical trial (RCT) was conducted among 6- to 9-year-old uncooperative children. One hundred and four sound mandibular and maxillary first permanent molars were randomly allocated to be sealed with group I (UltraSeal XT® hydro™) or group II (Helioseal-F) in 34 uncooperative children.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Dent
July 2024
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical retention rate between hydrophilic and hydrophobic resin-based sealant placed under field setting and related factors.
Materials And Methods: Sixty-six children with 106 pairs of teeth in the same arch with matching International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) scores ranging from 0 to 2 were recruited. This study was a split-mouth design with each tooth in the pair randomly assigned into either hydrophobic resin-based sealant group (Concise white sealant, 3M.
J Clin Pediatr Dent
January 2024
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, 34126 Istanbul, Turkey.
The aim of this study was to compare the aging effects on wear, surface roughness and microhardness of fissure sealants having varying contents. Four fissure sealant types were used in the study: Aegis (Bosworth, USA) (Group A), Beautisealant (Shofu, Japan) (Group B), Clinpro (3M, USA) (Group C), and Ultraseal XT/Hydro (Ultradent, USA) (Group U). Hundred disc-shaped specimens (5 mm diameter/3 mm width) were designed according to the manufacturer's instructions and assigned for microhardness/Vickers Hardness (VHN), surface roughness, and wear tests.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Clin Pediatr Dent
January 2023
Department of Public Health Dentistry, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth University (Deemed to be University), Puducherry, India.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!