Rapid immunofluorescence (FA) methods for the detection of common respiratory viruses were compared with culture results over a 3-year period to assess the relative efficiency of FA in a clinical laboratory setting. For respiratory syncytial virus, efficiencies were high (sensitivity, 90 to 95%; specificity, 92 to 95%). The sensitivity of FA for detection of parainfluenza virus type 1, parainfluenza virus type 3, influenza A virus, and adenoviruses ranged from 28 to 63%, but specificities for these viruses were uniformly 98 to 100%. The observations form a basis for consideration of selective reduction of routine culture procedures for specimens with initial positive rapid FA results; however, the possibility of dual viral infection in some situations must also be considered.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC265899PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jcm.25.2.355-357.1987DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

detection common
8
common respiratory
8
respiratory viruses
8
parainfluenza virus
8
virus type
8
efficiency immunofluorescence
4
immunofluorescence rapid
4
rapid detection
4
viruses rapid
4
rapid immunofluorescence
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!