Cancer-Related Cognitive Outcomes Among Older Breast Cancer Survivors in the Thinking and Living With Cancer Study.

J Clin Oncol

Jeanne S. Mandelblatt, Gheorghe Luta, Xingtao Zhou, Jonathan Clapp, Wanting Zhai, Asma Dilawari, Claudine Isaacs, Lindsay C. Kobayashi, Raymond Turner, and John W. VanMeter, Georgetown University; Asma Dilawari, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; Brent J. Small, Heather Jim, and Martine Extermann, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL; Arti Hurria, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte; Elizabeth Breen and Judith E. Carroll, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA; Brenna C. McDonald, Kelly Holohan Nudelman, Danielle Tometich, and Andrew J. Saykin, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; Deena Graham, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack, NJ; Neelima Denduluri, US Oncology, Arlington, VA; Paul B. Jacobsen, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; James Root and Tim Ahles, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; James Root, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY; and Robert A. Stern, Boston University, Boston, MA.

Published: October 2018

Purpose: To determine treatment and aging-related effects on longitudinal cognitive function in older breast cancer survivors.

Methods: Newly diagnosed nonmetastatic breast cancer survivors (n = 344) and matched controls without cancer (n = 347) 60 years of age and older without dementia or neurologic disease were recruited between August 2010 and December 2015. Data collection occurred during presystemic treatment/control enrollment and at 12 and 24 months through biospecimens; surveys; self-reported Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function; and neuropsychological tests that measured attention, processing speed, and executive function (APE) and learning and memory (LM). Linear mixed-effects models tested two-way interactions of treatment group (control, chemotherapy with or without hormonal therapy, and hormonal therapy) and time and explored three-way interactions of ApoE (ε4+ v not) by group by time; covariates included baseline age, frailty, race, and cognitive reserve.

Results: Survivors and controls were 60 to 98 years of age, were well educated, and had similar baseline cognitive scores. Treatment was related to longitudinal cognition scores, with survivors who received chemotherapy having increasingly worse APE scores ( P = .05) and those initiating hormonal therapy having lower LM scores at 12 months ( P = .03) than other groups. These group-by-time differences varied by ApoE genotype, where only ε4+ survivors receiving hormone therapy had short-term decreases in adjusted LM scores (three-way interaction P = .03). For APE, the three-way interaction was not significant ( P = .14), but scores were significantly lower for ε4+ survivors exposed to chemotherapy (-0.40; 95% CI, -0.79 to -0.01) at 24 months than ε4+ controls (0.01; 95% CI, 0.16 to 0.18; P < .05). Increasing age was associated with lower baseline scores on all cognitive measures ( P < .001); frailty was associated with baseline APE and self-reported decline ( P < .001).

Conclusion: Breast cancer systemic treatment and aging-related phenotypes and genotypes are associated with longitudinal decreases in cognitive function scores in older survivors. These data could inform treatment decision making and survivorship care planning.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7237199PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.00140DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast cancer
16
hormonal therapy
12
older breast
8
cancer survivors
8
treatment aging-related
8
cognitive function
8
years age
8
scores
8
ε4+ survivors
8
three-way interaction
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!