Objectives: This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical outcomes and pooled complication rate of femoral, tibial, and humeral fracture fixation using SIGN nails. We aimed at comparing the pooled rate of adverse events based on the country of study origin, acute versus delayed fracture fixation, and length of follow-up.

Methods: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE/Cochrane databases from 2000 to 2016 for English language studies. There was substantial heterogeneity among included studies. Therefore, we used subgroup analysis of varying adverse events and removal of potential outlier studies based on the "remove one" sensitivity analysis to address the heterogeneity across studies. A funnel plot was drawn and inspected visually to assess publication bias. We reported pooled complication rates for each adverse event with 95% prediction interval.

Results: There were 14 studies with 47,169 cases across 58 different low- and middle-income countries. The average age was 33 ± 14 years, with 83% men and 17% women. Sixty percent of SIGN nails used in these 14 studies were used in femur fracture fixation, 38% in tibial shaft fractures, and the remaining 2% for humeral shaft fractures. Approximately 23% of patients had follow-up data recorded. All studies that measured clinical outcome indicated that >90% achieved full weight-bearing status, favorable range of motion (knee range of motion >90 degrees according to the SIGN database), and radiographic or clinical union depending on the specific variable(s) measured in each study. The overall complication rate was 5.2% (4.4%-6.4%). Malalignment (>5 degrees of angulation in any plane) was the most common complication (7.6%), followed by delayed/nonunion (6.9%), infection (5.9%), and hardware failure, (3.2%).

Conclusions: Overall, the use of SIGN nails in fixing femoral, tibial, and humeral shaft fractures demonstrates good results with a high rate of return to full weight-bearing and radiographic/clinical union. The most common complications when using the SIGN nail are malalignment, delayed/nonunion, infection, and hardware failure.

Level Of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001328DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fracture fixation
12
sign nails
12
shaft fractures
12
clinical outcomes
8
systematic review
8
review meta-analysis
8
pooled complication
8
complication rate
8
femoral tibial
8
tibial humeral
8

Similar Publications

TiRobot-assisted versus freehand femoral neck system placement in the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Robot Surg

January 2025

The Third Ward of Orthopaedic Department, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, 804 Shengli South Street, Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, Ningxia, 750004, People's Republic of China.

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of TiRobot-assisted treatment for femoral neck fractures, in comparison to traditional freehand treatment methods. Throughout the research process, we conducted an extensive literature search across numerous databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), CQVIP, and Wanfang. Based on the literature screening criteria, we selected six studies, encompassing 358 cases of femoral neck fracture patients, for this meta-analysis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: A finite element analysis was performed to simulate the biomechanical differences between anterior-posterior (AP) direction and posterior-anterior (PA) direction placement of two cannulated screws in Hoffa fractures.

Methods: Computed tomography images of an healthy male volunteer were used to simulate Letenneur Ⅰ, Ⅱa, Ⅱb, Ⅱc, Ⅲ Hoffa fractures, and two groups of screw internal fixation models were constructed. Two 6.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

E-jet printed polycaprolactone with strontium-substituted mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles for bone tissue engineering.

Biomater Adv

January 2025

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University of Singapore, NUHS Tower Block, Level 11, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119228, Singapore.

Osteoporosis, characterized by reduced bone mineral density and increased fracture risk, poses a significant health challenge, particularly for aging populations. Systemic treatments often lead to adverse side effects, emphasizing the need for localized solutions. This study introduces a 3D-printed polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffold embedded with strontium-substituted mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles (Sr-MBGNPs) and icariin (ICN) for the targeted regeneration of osteoporotic bone.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Trauma and orthopaedic (T&O) surgery relies on medical implants and materials, often resulting in metalwork wastage (prosthesis, screws, nails, and plates). This places an economic strain on healthcare services and the environment. Our primary outcome is to quantify the implant wastage across the literature, and secondarily investigate the associated costs in this specialty.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Varus posteromedial rotatory instability (VPMRI) of the elbow is one of the complex elbow instability. The primary sites of injury encompass fractures of the anteromedial coronoid process and injuries to the lateral collateral ligament of the elbow. Some patients may present with involvement of the medial collateral ligament of the elbow.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!