Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Study Design: This is a retrospective cohort study.
Objective: To investigate surgical outcomes and instrumentation-related complications (IRCs) of dystrophic scoliosis associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1).
Summary Of Background Data: Surgical management, including the growing rod technique and early definitive fusion, has been recommended to avoid progression of NF-1 scoliosis. However, no study has investigated the outcomes and complications of different surgical interventions.
Materials And Methods: We performed a retrospective review of a cohort of 59 patients diagnosed with NF-1 dystrophic scoliosis and treated surgically. All clinical and radiographic data within a 3-year follow-up period were collected. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the surgical procedure used: those who underwent initial fusion surgery were assigned to group A (n=32) and those who underwent growing rod surgery to group B (n=27).
Results: Patients in group A were older than those in group B at the initial surgery (10.4 vs. 5.8 y; P<0.001). There was no difference in the sex ratio, preoperative Cobb angle, or preoperative kyphosis angle between the 2 groups (P>0.05). The correction rate of the main curve Cobb angle was higher in group A than B (55.1% vs. 42.4%; P<0.05). The incidence of IRC was higher in group B than A (48.1% vs. 12.5%; P<0.05). Complications in group A comprised 1 case of screw pullout, 1 case of rod breakage, 1 case of adding-on phenomenon, and 1 case of proximal junctional kyphosis. Complications in group B comprised 5 cases of adding-on phenomenon, 4 cases of trunk shift, 3 cases of curve progression, 1 case of rod breakage, and 1 case of cap loosening.
Conclusions: The use of growing rod effectively controls the spinal deformity and facilitates growth of the spine. Compared with fusion surgery, however, growing rod surgery yields a higher incidence of IRCs and lower corrective rate for scoliosis associated with NF-1.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000716 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!