Purpose: We aimed to report a single center's experience on endovascular treatment of true renal artery aneurysms (TRAAs), including treatment techniques and outcomes.

Methods: This retrospective study was designed to evaluate the treatment and follow-up of TRAAs treated by a variety of endovascular interventional techniques over a period of 6 years. Six patients with nine TRAAs were identified; seven of the TRAAs were treated using different combinations of coil embolization and flow diverter stents. The clinical findings, aneurysm characteristics, endovascular methods and treatment outcomes were reported.

Results: Seven TRAAs of six patients were treated, with a median aneurysm size of 20 mm. Three TRAAs were treated with primary sac occlusion (one with primary coil embolization, one with balloon and stent assisted coil and glue embolization, and one with amplatzer vascular occlusion device and coil embolization). The remaining four TRAAs of three patients were treated with flow diverter stents (Cardiatis, Silk, Pipeline, and Surpass). Immediate clinical success was achieved in patients treated with primary sac embolization (95% CI, 29.2%-100%). Among patients treated with flow diverter stents, one patient required an additional flow diverter at 6-month follow-up. The occlusion time in flow diverters ranged from 1 month to 12 months (median, 3.5 months) taking the repeat procedure into account. In patients treated with flow diverters, the clinical success rate was 100% (95% CI, 29.2%-100%) at one-year follow-up. Long-term follow-up ranged from 3 to 52 months. One intraprocedural complication was encountered with a flow diverter during deployment, which required additional stenting and tirofiban infusion. No other major complication was seen.

Conclusion: Endovascular treatment is an effective and safe method offering high success rates and low morbidity in the treatment of TRAAs and may supplant surgery as the primary therapy. Current experience in the use of flow diverter stents in TRAAs is limited to individual case reports with one brand of flow diverter device. Our small numbered series of four TRAAs shows our experience regarding endovascular treatment with different flow diverter brands.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6339632PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/dir.2018.17354DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

flow diverter
32
patients treated
20
endovascular treatment
16
diverter stents
16
traas treated
12
coil embolization
12
treated flow
12
traas
10
flow
10
treatment true
8

Similar Publications

Background: Flow diverters (FDs) have been introduced for the management of large or giant cavernous carotid aneurysms (CCAs) in addition to conventional modalities, dramatically changing treatment strategies. The aim of this study was to examine the management of unruptured large/giant CCAs in Japan when FDs were being introduced using a nationwide survey.

Methods: 540 unruptured large/giant CCAs treated at neurosurgical teaching departments in Japan between 2012 and 2016 were retrospectively studied.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the indications and therapeutic efficacy of flow-diverting stents (FDSs) in the management of extracranial carotid artery aneurysms (ECAAs) and dissections.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 18 patients treated for ECAAs with an FDS between 2010 and 2024. Patient demographics, aneurysm characteristics, procedural details, and clinical and radiologic follow-up outcomes were extracted from medical records.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The stent-assisted coiling (SAC) and flow-diverter stent (FDS) techniques are widely used in the endovascular treatment of paraclinoid aneurysms. This article compares the occlusion rate, periprocedural complications, and clinical outcomes of SAC and FDSs.

Methods: Between January 2010 and December 2020, a systematic search of electronic databases identified 2283 articles for screening.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: In recent years, the application of robotic assistance in diagnostic and therapeutic endovascular neurointerventional procedures has gained notable attention. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and current indications of robotic-assisted neurointerventions and to assess the degree of robotic assistance and reasons for unplanned manual conversion from robotic assistance.

Methods: We searched Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases following PRISMA guidelines and included studies with ≥ 4 patients reporting on robotic-assisted neurointerventions.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

As the number of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diverters continues to increase, it is important to understand what factors influence not only thrombus formation within the aneurysm cavity but also fibrin accumulation across the device and its associated disruption and blockage of the inflow stream. Both processes contribute to the eventual occlusion of the aneurysm or its continued patency and incomplete occlusion which may require future re-treatment. To investigate fibrin accumulation on flow diverters placed across the neck of cerebral aneurysms, a previously developed computational model that couples flow and fibrin dynamics is used in combination with experimental in vitro models of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diverters.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!