A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluation of flash glucose monitoring after long-term use: A pediatric survey. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to gather the opinions of children with type 1 diabetes on their daily use of flash glucose monitoring (FGM), specifically the FreeStyle Libre® system.
  • A survey conducted in French medical centers revealed that a majority of participants had been using the sensor for over three months, mainly to avoid finger prick pain and allow parents to monitor nighttime glucose levels.
  • Although most users reported satisfaction with FGM, they encountered challenges like sensor detachment and measurement errors, indicating the need for better training on its effective use for insulin management.

Article Abstract

Aims: To understand the opinions of children with type 1 diabetes about their everyday use of flash glucose monitoring. (FGM).

Methods: Children with type 1 diabetes using the FreeStyle Libre® FGM system and/or their parents were surveyed in several French medical centers between December 2016 and June 2017, regardless of their treatment regimen and metabolic control.

Results: Of the 347 patients recruited, 79.5% had been using the sensor for more than three months (average usage time: 285 days). The main reported motivations for initiating this type of monitoring were to avoid finger prick pain (for 85.9% of patients) and to allow parents to check nocturnal glucose levels (60.8%). Two-thirds of respondents experienced difficulties, mainly the sensor falling off (47.6%), measurement discrepancies (25.1%) and cutaneous reactions (22.2%); 89.5% changed their habits: 70.6% took more scans, 37.2% corrected their hyperglycemia more promptly, and 37.5% used trends to adjust their insulin dosage. About one-third of the study group (35.1%) experienced lower HbA1c levels, and two thirds (67.1%) were satisfied with the device.

Conclusions: Our results show that FGM is a widely accepted option for self-monitoring diabetes, but that specific training is required to improve its use for insulin dosage adjustment and metabolic results.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2018.08.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

flash glucose
8
glucose monitoring
8
children type
8
type diabetes
8
insulin dosage
8
evaluation flash
4
monitoring long-term
4
long-term pediatric
4
pediatric survey
4
survey aims
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!