Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the complication rates between transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) systematic prostate biopsy and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy techniques.
Materials And Methods: This is a single-center retrospective study, institutional review board approved. Systematic TRUS and MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy complication rates were compared in 967 men. A total of 319 patients were received systematic TRUS prostate biopsy and 648 patients underwent systematic TRUS + MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy. Complications were divided into immediate (those that occurred during the hospital observation period) and late (those that occurred within 5 days after biopsy).
Results: Seventeen complications were observed in patients who received either a systematic prostate biopsy or MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy. Severe complications were not observed in both groups. Among patients who underwent systematic prostate biopsy, 6 (1.9%) cases of complications were observed and between those who received MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy 11 (1.7%) cases of complications after the procedure (p = 0.873) were observed, with no statistical difference between groups. Also, no statistical differences between early and late complication groups (p > 0.999) were observed.
Conclusions: The complication rates were low in both groups, with no critical clinical outcomes and no significant difference of complication rates between systematic TRUS prostate biopsy and MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy techniques.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1782-y | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Exploring markers in nursing care of prostate cancer.
Medicine (Baltimore)
January 2025
Urology and Metabolic Rehabilitation Center, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Xixia Zhuang, Badachu, Shijingshan District, Beijing, China.
Prostate cancer is epithelial malignant prostate hyperplasia caused by a tumor. We found prostate cancer GSE141551 and GSE200879 profiles from gene expression omnibus database, followed by differentially expressed genes (DEGs) analysis, weighted gene co-expression network analysis, protein-protein interaction analysis, gene function enrichment analysis, and comparative toxicology database analysis. Finally, the gene expression heat map was drawn, and miRNA information regulating core DEGs was retrieved.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEpigenomics-guided precision oncology: Chromatin variants in prostate tumor evolution.
Int J Cancer
January 2025
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Prostate cancer is a common malignancy that in 5%-30% leads to treatment-resistant and highly aggressive disease. Metastasis-potential and treatment-resistance is thought to rely on increased plasticity of the cancer cells-a mechanism whereby cancer cells alter their identity to adapt to changing environments or therapeutic pressures to create cellular heterogeneity. To understand the molecular basis of this plasticity, genomic studies have uncovered genetic variants to capture clonal heterogeneity of primary tumors and metastases.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSestrin2 ameliorates age-related spontaneous benign prostatic hyperplasia via activation of AMPK/mTOR dependent autophagy.
Biogerontology
January 2025
Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University, 220 Gung-Dong, Yusung-Gu, Daejeon, 34134, Republic of Korea.
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), characterized as a chronic disease with unregulated enlargement of prostatic gland, is commonly observed in elderly men leading to lower urinary tract dysfunction. Sestrin2 plays a role in the maintenance of cellular homeostasis and protects organisms from various stimuli. The exact role of Sestrin2 in the etiology of BPH, a common age-related disease, remains unknown.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDiscordance between prostate MRI and PSMA-PET/CT: the next big challenge for primary prostate tumor assessment?
Eur Radiol
January 2025
Department of Radiology, Oncologic Imaging Division, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
Objectives: An increasing number of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) undergo assessment with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT). This offers comprehensive multimodality staging but can lead to discrepancies. The objective was to assess the rates and types of discordance between MRI and PSMA-PET/CT for primary PCa assessment.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTransperineal MR Fusion Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer in Office Setting: 1 Year Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Intermediate-Risk Patients.
J Endourol
January 2025
Urological Research Network, Miami Lakes, Florida, USA.
Focal therapy (FT) is an emerging option for intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IR-PCa). Transperineal MRI fusion laser ablation of PCa (TPFLA) is a novel FT technique with limited data reported. We conducted a phase I clinical trial evaluating the safety, feasibility, and 1-year oncologic results for patients with IR-PCa treated with TPFLA in an office setting.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!