Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The intraoperative identification of normal and anomalous brain tissue can be disturbed by pulsatile brain motion and movements of the patient and surgery devices. The performance of four motion correction methods are compared in this paper: Two intensity-based, applying optical flow algorithms, and two feature-based, which take corner features into account to track brain motion. The target registration error with manually selected marking points and the temporal standard deviation of intensity were analyzed in the evaluation. The results reveal the potential of the two types of methods.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2017-0188 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!