State Variations in Public Payer Reimbursement for Common Plastic Surgery Procedures.

Plast Reconstr Surg

From the Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine; and the Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan.

Published: December 2018

Background: Existing data suggest decreased willingness of plastic surgeons to participate in Medicare and Medicaid. Significant disparities exist in Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement for various general surgical procedures. The aims of this study were to investigate variations in Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement across the nation for common plastic surgery procedures.

Methods: Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement data for 2017 were obtained by means of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and publicly available fee schedules from each state, respectively, for eight common plastic surgery procedures. The difference in Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement was calculated across all states. The difference in value ascribed to each procedure was determined by comparing the payment from each payer to the work relative value units.

Results: Medicaid reimbursement rates were significantly lower for the selected procedures, with a median national discount of -25 percent ($16.09 per work relative value unit) compared to Medicare. There were higher median rates of reimbursement per work relative value unit by Medicaid in only five states when compared to Medicare. Significant variations of more than 15 percent in the Medicaid-to-Medicare reimbursement ratios between our selected procedures were identified in 28 states.

Conclusions: Variations exist between Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement for common plastic surgery procedures. The within-state variations in Medicaid reimbursement are likely reflective of important yet nontransparent differences in determining Medicaid reimbursement. These variations likely affect access to care for underserved populations. Professional societies should continue to convey the value of these important procedures and raise awareness regarding disparities in access to care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

medicaid reimbursement
32
medicare medicaid
28
common plastic
16
plastic surgery
16
surgery procedures
12
work relative
12
reimbursement
11
medicaid
11
medicare
9
reimbursement common
8

Similar Publications

Background: The sustainability of community pharmacies in the United States depends, in large part, on policies enacted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). In 2003, CMS policy allowed retrospective direct and indirect remuneration (DIR) fees to manage costs. From 2024, only prospective DIR fees are permitted.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Medicaid billing for community health worker services growing, but remains low, 2016-2020.

Health Aff Sch

January 2025

The Mullan Institute for Health Workforce Equity, Department of Health Policy and Management, The Milken Institute for Public Health, The George Washington University, 2175K Street, NW, Suite 250, Washington, DC 20037, United States.

Despite the recognized value of Community Health Workers (CHWs) in improving health outcomes, the integration of CHWs into Medicaid continues to be a challenge. This study examines the trends in CHW billing for Medicaid services across states from 2016 to 2020. We conducted an exploratory descriptive analysis of the Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System (T-MSIS) Analytic Files (TAF) 2016-2020 to identify trends in direct billing for CHW services, including beneficiaries served, total services rendered, payment type, place of service, and procedure codes used for services billed by CHWs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Identify differences in Medicare reimbursement changes for general otolaryngology, pediatric otolaryngology, head and neck oncology, laryngology, rhinology, otology, facial plastic and reconstructive surgery, and sleep surgery subspecialties from 2013 to 2024.

Methods: Subspecialty-based procedures' facility prices and relative value units (RVUs) were sourced from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Physician Fee Schedule. Prices were adjusted for inflation, and the average percent change in facility price and RVUs for each subspecialty was calculated.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Birth centers are an underused care setting with potential to improve birth experience and satisfaction. Both hospital-based and freestanding birth centers operate with the midwifery model of care that focuses on safe, low-intervention physiologic birth experiences for healthy, low-risk pregnant people. However, financial barriers limit freestanding birth center sustainability and accessibility in New Jersey, especially for traditionally marginalized populations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Guidance for an Effective Approach to Integrated Evidence Planning in a Dynamic World.

Clin Pharmacol Ther

January 2025

Boston Consulting Group, Zurich, Switzerland.

The value of a medicine is defined by its impact on patients, caregivers, health system, and society. A pharmaceutical company will generate evidence to demonstrate this value in various studies, including randomized clinical trials, non-interventional and observational studies, real-world data analyses, modeling, and simulation. The quality and strength of the evidence supporting a medicine's effectiveness, safety and product quality will drive decisions by healthcare system stakeholders for marketing authorization (regulatory authorities).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!