Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: Meta-analyses are routinely shaping patient care decisions. However, it is unknown whether meta-analyses are increasing in cardiology or whether complete search strategies are used. The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of search strategies of meta-analyses.
Methods: Meta-analyses assessing cardiovascular drug therapy published from 2006 to 2011 were identified through PubMed/Medline with the terms "cardiovascular agents" and "drug therapy."
Results: A total of 130 meta-analyses were identified. There was a 100% increase with the largest growth from 2008 to 2009. Only half of the analyses used 3 databases to identify studies for inclusion, which was predictive of using search terms ( P < .01; odds ratio, 3.05, 95% confidence interval, 1.341-6.952) and using a quality assessment tool ( P < .001; odds ratio, 3.05; 95% confidence interval, 2.038-8.066).
Conclusions: Meta-analyses evaluating cardiovascular drug therapy increased in 2011. Meta-analyses should exhaust all resources to identify trials for inclusion. As meta-analyses continue to change clinical practice, researchers and clinicians must critically assess the quality of these studies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2168479013487354 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!