Background: This study serves as a follow-up to a March 2012 analysis conducted by Frank Sasinowski that reviewed the quantum of effectiveness evidence that is required to secure FDA approval of therapies for rare diseases, or orphan drugs, from the 1983 enactment of the Orphan Drug Act through June 30, 2010. The current study was designed to determine, over the 4 years since the original study, how frequently FDA has required marketing applications of drugs for rare diseases to provide the conventional level of proof of effectiveness that is ordinarily expected for most drugs for prevalent diseases.
Methods: This study employed methods similar to the original analysis, identifying the noncancer orphan drugs approved as new chemical entities by relying on FDA's publicly available documents for drugs approved by FDA from July 1, 2010, to June 30, 2014. These materials were used to identify the basis for each drug's approval, and each approval was analyzed and classified.
Results: The results of this study show that for just over two-thirds of all noncancer orphan drugs approved between July 1, 2010, and June 30, 2014, FDA did not require the orphan drug applications to provide the conventional level of proof of effectiveness that is ordinarily expected for drugs for prevalent diseases. This is consistent with the results of the 2012 analysis.
Conclusions: The findings further support that FDA has demonstrated extraordinarily reasonable flexibility in its review of certain applications for orphan drugs and reinforce the need for FDA and drug companies to better understand and discuss the various types of flexibility.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2168479015580383 | DOI Listing |
Pharmacoeconomics
January 2025
Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre, Brussels, Belgium.
Background: Forecasting future public pharmaceutical expenditure is a challenge for healthcare payers, particularly owing to the unpredictability of new market introductions and their economic impact. No best-practice forecasting methods have been established so far. The literature distinguishes between the top-down approach, based on historical trends, and the bottom-up approach, using a combination of historical and horizon scanning data.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCancers (Basel)
January 2025
Hematology Unit, S. Eugenio Hospital (ASL Roma 2), 00122 Rome, Italy.
Menin (MEN1) is a well-recognized powerful tumor promoter in acute leukemias (AL) with KMT2A rearrangements (KMT2Ar, also known as MLL) and mutant nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1m) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). MEN1 is essential for sustaining leukemic transformation due to its interaction with wild-type KMT2A and KMT2A fusion proteins, leading to the dysregulation of KMT2A target genes. MEN1 inhibitors (MIs), such as revumenib, ziftomenib, and other active small molecules, represent a promising new class of therapies currently under clinical development.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci
December 2024
Pulmonary Circulation Centre, Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland; Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, St. John Paul II Hospital, Krakow, Poland.
A considerable percentage of ineffective treatment in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) may be related to subtherapeutic dosage or non-adherence. The aim of the study was to develop a simple analytical method suitable for plasma determination of selected drugs: riociguat (RIO), bosentan (BOS) and macitentan (MAC) administered to PAH patients. An isocratic HPLC-UV system (Spectra Physics - Shimadzu) with a manual injector (50 μL loop) was applied.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFRheumatol Ther
January 2025
Amgen GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Introduction: This study evaluated the prevalence and incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Germany and explored real-world data on sequence of therapy (SOT; sequence of drugs as prescribed in clinical practice).
Methods: This retrospective, observational, longitudinal cohort study using German claims data from the WIG2 GmbH Scientific Institute for Health Economics and Health System Research database (January 2011-December 2019), extrapolated to the statutory health insurance (SHI)-insured population, evaluated prevalence and incidence in an epidemiological analysis group and SLE treatment patterns in an incident cohort (subgroup ≥ 18 years of age with incident disease and ≥ 24-month follow-up post index date). Analyses were descriptive.
Health Econ Policy Law
January 2025
Economics & Law Department, Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, Frankfurt, Germany.
This study aimed to compare reimbursement prices for new, innovative non-orphan drugs in Germany based on price negotiation and cost-effectiveness analysis, using the efficiency frontier (EF) approach and cost-utility analysis (CUA). For the EF, the next effective intervention and no intervention were used as comparators. Three pairwise comparisons were conducted: negotiation vs EF, CUA vs EF and negotiation vs CUA.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!