Study Design: This study was a retrospective subgroup analysis of prospective cohort data.

Objective: The main objectives of this study were to develop a classification of degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) and concurrent lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) based on pathologic stage, and to determine how these subtypes of DS affect outcomes for minimally invasive (MIS) decompression SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA:: DS with LSS is a common clinical scenario, yet there is no consensus on optimal treatment. Natural history of DS is described as early degenerative damage, followed by instability, and eventual restabilization via spondylotic changes. MIS decompression surgery has become increasingly popular, but the effect of DS subtypes on clinical outcomes after MIS decompression is unknown.

Patients And Methods: From 2008 to 2013, all patients who underwent microendoscopic laminotomy for single-level LSS with DS were included. In total, 218 patients (91 male, 127 female individuals) were reviewed. DS pathologic staging was defined as early, advanced, or end stage, based on percent slippage (10% slippage), degree of dynamic instability (3 mm), and disc height. The following variables were evaluated preoperatively and >2 years postoperatively and compared among groups: Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, JOA recovery rate, and Visual Analog Scale low back pain.

Results: In total, 173 patients were included in final analysis. Final follow-up period was 2.3 years. Average JOA recovery rate was 63.8%. There were no significant differences in JOA recovery and Visual Analog Scale among 3 DS stages (P>0.05). In total, 9.8% of patients required additional spine surgery, with 5% requiring subsequent fusion. All patients who required subsequent fusion were in the advanced stage DS group.

Conclusions: Microendoscopic decompression is an effective treatment for patients with DS and concurrent LSS, with only 5% of patients requiring subsequent fusion at over 2-year follow-up, and another 5% requiring revision or adjacent segment decompression. The advanced stage DS group, indicating a >10% anterolisthesis and/or >3 mm of dynamic instability, was more likely to require additional surgery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000710DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mis decompression
12
advanced stage
12
joa recovery
12
subsequent fusion
12
microendoscopic decompression
8
lumbar spinal
8
spinal stenosis
8
degenerative spondylolisthesis
8
disc height
8
clinical outcomes
8

Similar Publications

Surgical interventions for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

EClinicalMedicine

January 2025

Department of Neurosurgery and Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Centre and Cochrane China Centre and MAGIC China Centre and IDEAL China Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Background: Surgical interventions for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) include conventional craniotomy (CC), decompressive craniectomy (DC), and minimally invasive surgery (MIS), with the latter encompassing endoscopic surgery (ES) and minimally invasive puncture surgery (MIPS). However, the superiority of surgery over conservative medical treatment (CMT) and the comparative benefits of different surgical procedures remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various surgical interventions for treating ICH.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis compared minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to open surgery for treatment of spinal metastases with respect to perioperative outcomes. Few studies have systemically assessed the body of evidence on this topic.

Methods: A systematic review of EMBASE and PubMed from database inception to December 2023 was performed to identify studies comparing MIS with open surgery for the treatment of spine metastases.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study was a retrospective cohort review comparing single level (SLD) and dual level (DLD) minimally invasive decompression surgeries for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in patients with adjacent level disease.
  • Findings indicated that patients undergoing single level decompression experienced similar clinical outcomes to those with dual level decompression over a 2-year period, despite longer operative times for DLD procedures.
  • The conclusion suggests that for patients with single level symptoms and adjacent stenosis, treating only the symptomatic level is equally effective, potentially reducing unnecessary risks and surgery time associated with dual level procedures.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study highlights the benefits of lateral indirect decompression over traditional posterior approaches for treating low-grade spondylolisthesis, demonstrating that it can effectively release nerves with fewer complications using minimally invasive techniques and intraoperative neuromonitoring.
  • A total of 20 patients underwent the minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) from 2022 to March 2024, with impressive postoperative results, including significant reductions in back and leg pain, and a successful correction of spondylolisthesis.
  • Follow-up data showed a mean operation time of about 81 minutes, minimal blood loss, and a short hospital stay, with 75% of patients rated
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) is a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) technique utilized for lumbar decompression, which has recently gained popularity in Europe. We aimed to explore the value of sequential adaptive e-learning, followed by simulator-based hands-on training modules for UBE at the occasion of the 2024 EANS Young Neurosurgeons meeting.

Materials And Methods: An adaptive e-learning was designed by learning engineers (Area 9 Lyceum), based on theoretical content provided by two endoscopic spine surgeons.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!