Measuring Clinical Productivity of Anesthesiology Groups: Surgical Anesthesia at the Facility Level.

Anesthesiology

From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas (A.E.A.) the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (M.E.H.) the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas (C.W.W.).

Published: February 2019

Benchmarking and comparing group productivity is an essential activity of data-driven management. For clinical anesthesiology, accomplishing this task is a daunting effort if meaningful conclusions are to be made. For anesthesiology groups, productivity must be done at the facility level in order to reduce some of the confounding factors. When industry or external comparisons are done, then the use of total ASA units per anesthetizing sites allows for overall productivity comparisons. Additional productivity components (total ASA units/h, h/case, h/operating room/d) allow for leaders to develop productivity dashboards. With the emergence of large groups that provide care in multiple facilities, these large groups can choose to invest more effort in collecting data and comparing facility productivity internally with group-defined measurements including total ASA units per full time equivalent.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002398DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

total asa
12
anesthesiology groups
8
facility level
8
asa units
8
large groups
8
productivity
7
measuring clinical
4
clinical productivity
4
productivity anesthesiology
4
groups
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!