Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Sample sizes affect the precision of the confidence interval for the common effect size in a meta-analysis, which includes a number of independent studies of varying sizes. This paper provides a simplified method to estimate the precision of the confidence interval for the common effect size by using the number of independent studies and the average sample size of the independent studies. The simplified method proves to be very accurate for the retrospective meta-analyses. Two examples are then given to show how an investigator can use the number of independent studies and the average sample size of the individual studies to assess the precision of the confidence interval in a prospective meta-analysis.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2168479015570332 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!