A Comparison of Major Petroleum Life Cycle Models.

Clean Technol Environ Policy

Environmental Engineer, National Risk Management Research Laboratory, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther King Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45268.

Published: April 2017

Many organizations have attempted to develop an accurate well-to-pump life cycle model of petroleum products in order to inform decision makers of the consequences of its use. Our paper studies five of these models, demonstrating the differences in their predictions and attempting to evaluate their data quality. Carbon dioxide well-to-pump emissions for gasoline showed a variation of 35%, and other pollutants such as ammonia and particulate matter varied up to 100%. Differences in allocation do not appear to explain differences in predictions. Effects of these deviations on well-to-wheels passenger vehicle and truck transportation life cycle models may be minimal for effects such as global warming potential (6% spread), but for respiratory effects of criteria pollutants (41% spread) and other impact categories, they can be significant. A data quality assessment of the models' documentation revealed real differences between models in temporal and geographic representativeness, completeness, as well as transparency. Stakeholders may need to consider carefully the tradeoffs inherent when selecting a model to conduct life cycle assessments for systems that make heavy use of petroleum products.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6134862PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1260-6DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

life cycle
16
cycle models
8
petroleum products
8
differences predictions
8
data quality
8
comparison major
4
major petroleum
4
life
4
petroleum life
4
cycle
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!