National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Steering Committee Working Group Report on Meaningful and Appropriate End Points for Clinical Trials in Metastatic Breast Cancer.

J Clin Oncol

Andrew D. Seidman, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Dawn L. Hershman, Columbia University, New York, NY; Louise Bordeleau, Hamilton Health Sciences and Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Louis Fehrenbacher, Kaiser Permanente, Vallejo, CA; William E. Barlow, Cancer Research and Biostatistics, Seattle, WA; Jane Perlmutter, Gemini Group, Ann Arbor, MI; Lawrence Rubinstein, Jennifer Fallas Hayes, and Larissa A. Korde, National Cancer Institute; Lynn Pearson Butler, The Emmes Corporation, Rockville; Suparna B. Wedam, Julia A. Beaver, and Laleh Amiri-Kordestani, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring; Jo Anne Zujewski, JZ Oncology, Bethesda, MD; Mary Lou Smith, Research Advocacy Network, Plano, TX; Meredith M. Regan, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; and Priya Rastogi, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.

Published: November 2018

Purpose: To provide evidence-based consensus recommendations on choice of end points for clinical trials in metastatic breast cancer, with a focus on biologic subtype and line of therapy.

Methods: The National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Steering Committee convened a working group of breast medical oncologists, patient advocates, biostatisticians, and liaisons from the Food and Drug Administration to conduct a detailed curated systematic review of the literature, including original reports, reviews, and meta-analyses, to determine the current landscape of therapeutic options, recent clinical trial data, and natural history of four biologic subtypes of breast cancer. Ongoing clinical trials for metastatic breast cancer in each subtype also were reviewed from ClinicalTrials.gov for planned primary end points. External input was obtained from the pharmaceutic/biotechnology industry, real-world clinical data specialists, experts in quality of life and patient-reported outcomes, and combined metrics for assessing magnitude of clinical benefit.

Results: The literature search yielded 146 publications to inform the recommendations from the working group.

Conclusion: Recommendations for appropriate end points for metastatic breast cancer clinical trials focus on biologic subtype and line of therapy and the magnitude of absolute and relative gains that would represent meaningful clinical benefit.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7351338PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.00242DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast cancer
28
clinical trials
16
metastatic breast
16
trials metastatic
12
national cancer
8
cancer institute
8
breast
8
institute breast
8
cancer
8
cancer steering
8

Similar Publications

Background: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are fundamental to evidence-based medicine, but their real-world impact on clinical practice often remains unmonitored. Leveraging large-scale real-world data can enable systematic monitoring of RCT effects. We aimed to develop a reproducible framework using real-world data to assess how major RCTs influence medical practice, using two pivotal surgical RCTs in gynaecologic oncology as an example-the LACC (Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer) and LION (Lymphadenectomy in Ovarian Neoplasms) trials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly aggressive subtype of breast cancer, characterized by frequent recurrence, metastasis, and poor survival outcomes despite chemotherapy-based treatments. This study aims to investigate the mechanisms by which Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) modulates the tumor immune microenvironment in TNBC, utilizing CiteSpace and bioinformatics analysis.

Methods: We employed CiteSpace to analyze treatment hotspots and key TCM formulations, followed by bioinformatics analysis to identify the main active components, targets, associated pathways, and their clinical implications in TNBC treatment.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent malignant tumor in women, with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) showing the poorest prognosis among all subtypes. Glycosylation is increasingly recognized as a critical biomarker in the tumor microenvironment, particularly in BC. However, the glycosylation-related genes associated with TNBC have not yet been defined.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: A promising feature of marine sponges is the potential anticancer efficacy of their secondary metabolites. The objective of this study was to explore the anticancer activities of compounds from the fungal symbiont of on breast cancer cells.

Methods: In the present research, , an endophytic fungal strain derived from the marine sponge was successfully isolated and characterized.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Nanoparticle technology has revolutionized breast cancer treatment by offering innovative solutions addressing the gaps in traditional treatment methods. This paper aimed to comprehensively explore the historical journey and advancements of nanoparticles in breast cancer treatment, highlighting their transformative impact on modern medicine. The discussion traces the evolution of nanoparticle-based therapies from their early conceptualization to their current applications and future potential.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!