Comorbidity Assessment in the National Cancer Database for Patients With Surgically Resected Breast, Colorectal, or Lung Cancer (AFT-01, -02, -03).

J Oncol Pract

University of California San Francisco; San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA; University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL; and Washington University, St. Louis, MO.

Published: October 2018

AI Article Synopsis

  • Accurate measurement of comorbidities is essential in cancer research, and this study compares the National Cancer Database's (NCDB) code-based Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index (CCI) with a chart-based CCI for breast, colorectal, and lung cancer patients.
  • The analysis involved re-abstracting data from over 31,000 patients to assess how well these CCI versions predict 5-year overall survival after surgery.
  • Results showed the NCDB CCI often underestimated comorbidity rates, particularly in lung cancer patients, but its predictive power for survival was similar to that of the more detailed chart-based CCI.

Article Abstract

Purpose: Accurate comorbidity measurement is critical for cancer research. We evaluated comorbidity assessment in the National Cancer Database (NCDB), which uses a code-based Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index (CCI), and compared its prognostic performance with a chart-based CCI and individual comorbidities in a national sample of patients with breast, colorectal, or lung cancer.

Patients And Methods: Through an NCDB Special Study, cancer registrars re-abstracted perioperative comorbidities for 11,243 patients with stage II to III breast cancer, 10,880 with stage I to III colorectal cancer, and 9,640 with stage I to III lung cancer treated with definitive surgical resection in 2006-2007. For each cancer type, we compared the prognostic performance of the NCDB code-based CCI (categorical: 0 or missing data, 1, 2+), Special Study chart-based CCI (continuous), and 18 individual comorbidities in three separate Cox proportional hazards models for postoperative 5-year overall survival.

Results: Comorbidity was highest among patients with lung cancer (13.2% NCDB CCI 2+) and lowest among patients with breast cancer (2.8% NCDB CCI 2+). Agreement between the NCDB and Special Study CCI was highest for breast cancer (rank correlation, 0.50) and lowest for lung cancer (rank correlation, 0.40). The NCDB CCI underestimated comorbidity for 19.1%, 29.3%, and 36.2% of patients with breast, colorectal, and lung cancer, respectively. Within each cancer type, the prognostic performance of the NCDB CCI, Special Study CCI, and individual comorbidities to predict postoperative 5-year overall survival was similar.

Conclusion: The NCDB underestimated comorbidity in patients with surgically resected breast, colorectal, or lung cancer, partly because the NCDB codes missing data as CCI 0. However, despite underestimation of comorbidity, the NCDB CCI was similar to the more complete measures of comorbidity in the Special Study in predicting overall survival.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6184079PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JOP.18.00175DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

lung cancer
24
special study
20
ncdb cci
20
cancer
16
breast colorectal
16
colorectal lung
16
cci
12
prognostic performance
12
individual comorbidities
12
patients breast
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!