Cervical Pessary Compared With Vaginal Progesterone for Preventing Early Preterm Birth: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Obstet Gynecol

Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics, and the Clinical Pharmacology Service, University Hospital Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, and the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics, Hospital Fundación Alcorcón, Madrid, the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics, Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics, Complejo Asistencial León, León, the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics, Hospital Burgos, Burgos, the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics, Hospital Infanta Elena, Valdemoro, and the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics, Hospital de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.

Published: October 2018

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of a cervical pessary and vaginal progesterone to prevent spontaneous preterm births in pregnant women with cervical lengths 25 mm or less as measured by transvaginal ultrasonography.

Methods: This was a multicenter, open-label, randomized, noninferiority trial. Women with singleton pregnancies and a short cervix (25 mm or less) measured transvaginally at the second-trimester ultrasonogram were invited to participate. They were computer-randomized (one to one) into cervical pessary placement or treatment with vaginal progesterone (200 mg/24 hours). The primary outcome was spontaneous preterm delivery before 34 weeks of gestation. The noninferiority margin was set at 4% with a 0.025 one-sided α level and a statistical power of 80%. That is, if the 95% CI upper bound exceeded 4%, the pessary could not be deemed noninferior. A sample size of 254 women was required to show noninferiority of the pessary to progesterone.

Results: The trial was conducted from August 2012 to April 2016 with the participation of 27 Spanish hospitals. A total of 254 patients were enrolled and 246 included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Demographic and baseline characteristics were similar across groups. The rate of spontaneous delivery before 34 weeks of gestation was 14% (n=18/127) in the pessary group and 14% (n=17/119) in the progesterone group with a risk difference of -0.11% (95% CI -8.85% to 8.62%; P=.99), that is, noninferiority was not shown for the pessary. The incidence of increased vaginal discharge (87% vs 71%, P=.002) and discomfort (27% vs 3%, P<.001) was significantly higher in the pessary group.

Conclusion: A cervical pessary was not noninferior to vaginal progesterone for preventing spontaneous birth before 34 weeks of gestation in pregnant women with short cervixes.

Clinical Trial Registration: EU Clinical Trials Register, 2012-000241-13; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01643980.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002884DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cervical pessary
12
vaginal progesterone
12
spontaneous preterm
8
delivery weeks
8
weeks gestation
8
noninferiority pessary
8
pessary
6
cervical
4
pessary compared
4
vaginal
4

Similar Publications

Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy with Autologous Fascia Lata.

Int Urogynecol J

December 2024

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.

Introduction And Hypothesis: Autologous fascia lata has been increasingly utilised in pelvic floor reconstructive surgeries such as sacrocolpopexy and sacrohysteropexy. This case highlights sacrohysteropexy with autologous fascia lata as a promising option for women with advanced uterovaginal prolapse who wish to preserve their uterus and avoid synthetic mesh.

Methods: We report the case of a 65-year-old woman with stage 3 pelvic organ prolapse following one forceps and one spontaneous vaginal delivery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: As previous studies on the use of a cervical pessary to prevent preterm birth (PTB) have produced conflicting results, we aimed to investigate the feasibility, acceptability and safety of a new technique for inserting a cervical pessary and compare it with the traditional technique in patients at high risk of PTB.

Methods: Women at high risk of PTB treated with a cervical pessary between January 2018 and January 2021 were retrospectively evaluated. After applying exclusion criteria, a total of 68 eligible patients were identified and retrospectively analyzed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Previous spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) is a strong risk indicator for recurrent preterm birth (PTB). Cervical cerclage is an accepted intervention to prevent recurrent PTB in high risk patients. Cervical pessary might be a less invasive alternative.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Cervical insufficiency accounts for 8 % of preterm births. Pessary and cerclage are considered preventive approaches for preterm birth. These interventions were compared in terms of reducing the prematurity rate in women with previous preterm birth, due to cervical insufficiency or due to having a short cervix in their current pregnancy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: For asymptomatic individuals with a singleton pregnancy and a short cervix, vaginal progesterone significantly decreases the risk of PTB and improves perinatal outcomes. Cervical pessary is another option that has been evaluated with inconclusive results. There is, however, a lack of head-to-head comparisons between pessary and vaginal progesterone in this high risk population.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!