Expanded In-School Instructional Time and the Advancement of Health Equity: A Community Guide Systematic Review.

J Public Health Manag Pract

Community Guide Branch, Division of Public Health Information Dissemination (Drs Peng, Finnie, and Hahn), and Office of the Associate Director for Science, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD & TB Prevention (Dr Truman), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, Georgia; Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey (Dr Johnson); UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, Los Angeles, California (Dr Fielding); University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (Dr Muntaner); Columbia University, New York, New York (Dr Fullilove); and National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Washington, District of Columbia (Dr Zhang). Names and affiliations of the Community Preventive Services Task Force members can be found at www.thecommunityguide.org/about/task-force-members.html.

Published: June 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • Expanded in-school instructional time (EISIT) could help close racial/ethnic educational achievement gaps, potentially improving employment opportunities and reducing health risks in marginalized populations.
  • A systematic review of 11 studies found that schools with EISIT showed a modest improvement in test scores, with a median increase of 0.05 standard deviations, though results varied.
  • Overall, the evidence on the effectiveness of EISIT is limited, with small effect sizes and insufficient data to conclusively determine its impact on academic achievement and health equity.

Article Abstract

Expanded in-school instructional time (EISIT) may reduce racial/ethnic educational achievement gaps, leading to improved employment, and decreased social and health risks. When targeted to low-income and racial/ethnic minority populations, EISIT may thus promote health equity. Community Guide systematic review methods were used to search for qualified studies (through February 2015, 11 included studies) and summarize evidence of the effectiveness of EISIT on educational outcomes. Compared with schools with no time change, schools with expanded days improved students' test scores by a median of 0.05 standard deviation units (range, 0.0-0.25). Two studies found that schools with expanded day and year improved students' standardized test scores (0.04 and 0.15 standard deviation units). Remaining studies were inconclusive. Given the small effect sizes and a lack of information about the use of added time, there is insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of EISIT on academic achievement and thus health equity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7359915PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000834DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

health equity
12
expanded in-school
8
in-school instructional
8
instructional time
8
equity community
8
community guide
8
guide systematic
8
systematic review
8
effectiveness eisit
8
schools expanded
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!