AI Article Synopsis

  • This study evaluated the effectiveness of dual bronchodilation (long-acting β-agonist + long-acting muscarinic antagonist) versus triple therapy (adding inhaled corticosteroid) for patients with COPD in a real-world setting.
  • Dual bronchodilation resulted in fewer patients experiencing exacerbations (15.5%) compared to triple therapy (26.6%) over one year, and showed a greater improvement in health status based on the COPD Assessment Test scores.
  • Findings suggest that for patients with COPD, especially those switching from mono-bronchodilator to dual bronchodilation, dual therapy may provide better outcomes than triple therapy without significant prior exacerbations.

Article Abstract

Background: No observational studies have evaluated the "real-world" effectiveness of dual bronchodilation comprising a long-acting β-agonist plus a long-acting muscarinic antagonist vs that of triple therapy (long-acting β-agonist plus long-acting muscarinic antagonist plus inhaled corticosteroid) in COPD.

Materials And Methods: DACCORD is a non-interventional, observational clinical study that recruited patients following COPD maintenance therapy initiation or change in maintenance therapy between or within therapeutic class. Given the non-interventional nature of the study, the decision to initiate or change medication had to be made by the patients' physicians prior to inclusion in DACCORD. We used a matched-pairs analysis to compare disease progression in two patient groups: those receiving dual bronchodilation vs those receiving triple therapy (each group n=1,046).

Results: In two subgroups of patients matched according to a broad range of demographic and disease characteristics, over 1 year, fewer patients receiving dual bronchodilation exacerbated than those receiving triple therapy (15.5% vs 26.6%; <0.001), with a greater improvement from baseline in COPD Assessment Test total score at 1 year (mean±SD -2.9±5.8 vs -1.4±5.5;<0.001). When analyzed according to prior therapy, the highest rate of exacerbations was in patients on triple therapy prior to the study who remained on triple therapy. Those changing from mono-bronchodilator to dual bronchodilation had the greatest COPD Assessment Test total score improvement.

Conclusion: In this "real-life" cohort of patients with COPD, most of whom had not exacerbated in the 6 months prior to entry, triple therapy did not seem to improve outcomes compared with dual bronchodilation in terms of either exacerbations or health status. Our analyses clearly demonstrate the potential impact of prior medication on study results, something that should be taken into account when interpreting the results even of controlled clinical trials.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6113909PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S169958DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dual bronchodilation
16
triple therapy
16
long-acting β-agonist
8
β-agonist long-acting
8
long-acting muscarinic
8
muscarinic antagonist
8
maintenance therapy
8
receiving dual
8
receiving triple
8
therapy
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!