A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Femoral entheseal shape and attachment angle as potential risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury. | LitMetric

Femoral entheseal shape and attachment angle as potential risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament injury.

J Mech Behav Biomed Mater

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, AnnArbor, MI, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, AnnArbor, MI, USA; Program in Macromolecular Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Published: December 2018

Although non-contact human ACL tears are a common knee injury, little is known about why they usually fail near the femoral enthesis. Recent histological studies have identified a range of characteristic femoral enthesis tidemark profiles and ligament attachment angles. We tested the effect of the tidemark profile and attachment angle on the distribution of strain across the enthesis, under a ligament stretch of 1.1. We employed a 2D analytical model followed by 3D finite element models using three constitutive forms and solved with ABAQUS/Standard. The results show that the maximum equivalent strain was located in the most distal region of the ACL femoral enthesis. It is noteworthy that this strain was markedly increased by a concave (with respect to bone) entheseal profile in that region as well as by a smaller attachment angle, both of which are features more commonly found in females. Although the magnitude of the maximum equivalent strain predicted was not consistent among the constitutive models used, it did not affect the relationship observed between entheseal shape and maximum equivalent strain. We conclude that a concave tidemark profile and acute attachment angle at the femoral ACL enthesis increase the risk for ACL failure, and that failure is most likely to begin in the most distal region of that enthesis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6417098PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.045DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

attachment angle
16
femoral enthesis
12
maximum equivalent
12
equivalent strain
12
entheseal shape
8
tidemark profile
8
distal region
8
enthesis
6
femoral
5
attachment
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!