Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Metal organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as great adsorbent and membrane candidates for separation of CO/H mixtures. The main challenge is the existence of thousands of MOFs, which requires computational screening methods to identify the best materials prior to experimental efforts. In this study, we performed high-throughput computational screening of MOFs to examine their adsorbent and membrane performances for CO/H separation. Grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were used to compute various adsorbent and membrane performance metrics of 3857 MOFs. CO/H adsorption selectivities of MOFs at pressure swing adsorption (PSA) and vacuum swing adsorption (VSA) conditions were calculated to be in the range of 2.5-25 000 and 2.5-85 000, respectively, outperforming many zeolite adsorbents. Correlations between the ranking of MOF adsorbents at the PSA and VSA conditions were examined. H/CO selectivities and H permeabilities of MOF membranes were computed as 2.1 × 10-6.3 and 230-1.7 × 10 Barrer, respectively. A high number of MOF membranes was identified to surpass the upper bound defined for polymers due to high gas permeabilities of MOFs. Structure-performance relations revealed that MOFs with narrow pore sizes and low porosities are the best adsorbent materials for separation of CO from H, whereas MOFs with large pore sizes and high porosities are the best membrane materials for selective separation of H. Our results will guide the selection of MOF adsorbents and membranes for efficient H purification and CO capture processes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6172601 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b12746 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!