Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Purpose: To explore the relationship between metabolic uptake of the F-ALF-NOTA-PRGD (F-RGD) tracer on positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) and the antiangiogenic effect of apatinib in patients with solid malignancies.
Materials And Patients: Patients with measurable lesions scheduled for second- or third-line single-agent therapy with apatinib were eligible for this prospective clinical trial. All patients underwent F-RGD PET/CT examination before the start of treatment. Standardized uptake values (SUVs) of contoured tumor lesions were computed and compared using independent sample t-tests or the Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine accuracy in predicting response. Survival curves were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results: Of 38 patients who consented to study participation, 25 patients with 42 measurable lesions met the criteria for inclusion in this response assessment analysis. The median follow-up time was 3 months (range, 1-10 months), and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3 months (95% confidence interval, 1.04-4.96). The SUV and SUV were significantly higher in responding tumors than in non-responding tumors (4.98 ± 2.34 vs 3.59 ± 1.44, p = 0.048; 3.71 ± 1.15 vs 2.95 ± 0.49, P = 0.036). SUV did not differ between responding tumors and non-responding tumors (6.58 ± 3.33 vs 4.74 ± 1.83, P = 0.078). An exploratory ROC curve analysis indicated that SUV [area under the ROC curve (AUC) = 0.700] was a better parameter than SUV (AUC = 0.689) for predicting response. Using a threshold value of 3.82, high SUV at baseline was associated with improved PFS (5.0 vs. 3.4 months, log-rank P = 0.036).
Conclusion: F-RGD uptake on PET/CT imaging pretreatment may predict the response to antiangiogenic therapy, with higher F-RGD uptake in tumors predicting a better response to apatinib therapy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4143-8 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!