Background And Objective: Pain neuroscience education (PNE) has shown promising ability in previous reviews to improve pain and disability in chronic low back pain (CLBP). This review aimed to evaluate randomized controlled trials comparing the effectiveness of PNE on pain and disability in CLBP.
Databases And Data Treatment: A systematic search was performed using the databases of EBSCO, Medline, Cochrane and Web of Science. Meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.1 software to pool outcomes using the random effects model, weighted mean differences (WMD), standard deviation, 95% confidence intervals and sample size. GRADEpro software was utilized to calculate overall strength of evidence.
Results: A total of 6,767 papers were found, eight were included (n = 615). Meta-analysis for short-term pain (n = 428) demonstrated a WMD of 0.73 (95%CI -0.14, 1.61) on a ten-point scale of PNE against no PNE (GRADE analysis low evidence). When PNE alongside physiotherapy interventions were grouped for pain (n = 212), a WMD of 1.32 was demonstrated (95% CI 1.08, 1.56, p < 0.00001; GRADE analysis moderate evidence). Short-term disability (RMDQ) meta-analysis demonstrated a WMD of 0.42 (95%CI 0.28, 0.56; p < 0.00001; n = 362; GRADE analysis moderate evidence); whereas the addition of PNE to physiotherapy interventions demonstrated a WMD of 3.94 (95% CI 3.37, 4.52; p < 0.00001; GRADE analysis moderate evidence.
Conclusion: This review presents moderate evidence that the addition of PNE to usual physiotherapy intervention in patients with CLBP improves disability in the short term. However, this meta-analysis failed to show evidence of long-term improvement on pain or disability when adding PNE to usual physiotherapy.
Significance: This review demonstrates moderate level evidence that the use of pain neuroscience education alongside physiotherapy interventions probably improves disability and pain in the short term in chronic low back pain. These results provide greater support for the addition of pain neuroscience education in routine physiotherapy practice in chronic low back pain.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1314 | DOI Listing |
Pain Med
January 2025
IRCCS IstitutoOrtopedico Galeazzi, Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, Milan, Italy.
Objective: To assess the effectiveness of cognitive functional therapy (CFT) in reducing disability and pain compared to other interventions in chronic spinal pain patients.
Methods: Five databases were queried to October 2023 for retrieving randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including patients with chronic spinal pain and administering CFT. Primary outcomes were disability and pain.
Sci Rep
January 2025
Department of Physical Therapy for Women's Health, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Deraya University, Minia, Egypt.
Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is one of the most prevalent reasons for disability, it affects the contraction ratio of the muscles of the back. Imaging is critical for diagnosing back muscles. The purpose of this study was to look at changes in the muscle contraction ratio of the lumbar multifidus (LM) and erector spinae (ES) in unilateral SIJ pain.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPain Manag Nurs
January 2025
Headache Unit, Neurology Service, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; Headache Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute, Autònoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address:
Purpose: Headache is a prevalent and highly disabling neurological disorder. There are no data on its prevalence in and impact on hospitalized patients. The objective of this study was to describe the prevalence of headache in hospitalized patients, triggers associated with headaches in this population, and compliance with documentation in the electronic medical record system (EMRS).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWorld Neurosurg
January 2025
Department of Clinical Medicine - Orthopedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 165, DK-8200, Aarhus N.
Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following lumbar discectomy on patients with lateral lumbar disc herniation (LDH) compared to patients with paramedian LDH.
Background: Surgery for disc herniation is one of the most common procedures of the lumbar spine. LDHs can be divided into median, paramedian, foraminal and extraforaminal types based on the anatomical site of the lesion.
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (UBE-LIF) and endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-LIF) in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases in lumbar degenerative diseases.
Methods: A thorough literature search was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines and the PICO framework(PROSPERO 2024CRD42024592073). The databases searched included PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI), and Wanfang Database, with a time frame of January 2020 to June 2024.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!