Background: To evaluate the performance of a closed-cell designed venous stent for the treatment of chronic ilio-femoral venous outflow obstruction (VOO) in the shortterm.
Patients And Methods: Safety, stent patency and clinical outcome after placement of the Vici Venous Stent® in patients with chronic ilio-femoral venous obstruction were assessed retrospectively. Stent patency was evaluated by duplex ultrasound scanning, and clinical outcome was determined using the revised Venous Clinical Severity score (rVCSS).
Results: 75 patients (49 % female; median age 57 years; 82 limbs) with symptomatic significant VOO had stents placed in the ilio-femoral veins. Lower limb venous skin changes including ulcers (C-class in CEAP 4-6) were found in 31 patients (41 %). Nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions (NIVLs) and post-thrombotic obstruction (PTO) were found in 40 and 42 limbs, respectively. There were no safety issues. Cumulative primary, assisted-primary, and secondary stent patency in the entire cohort at 12 months were 94 %, 94 % and 96 %, respectively. Five limbs presented with stent occlusion. Two limbs had no intervention, 2/3 remained patent after reintervention. Clinical improvement (a decrease ≥ 2 rVCSS points) was observed in 81 %, 81 %, and 77 % of patients at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months, respectively. There was a marked drop in the frequency of more marked pain and swelling (VCSS ≥ 2) from 62 % to 5 % and 93 % to 19 %, respectively. Four limbs had venous ulcers, three healed during the follow-up. Cumulative pri- mary stent patency at 12 months was 100 % and 87 % in patients with NIVL and PTO, respectively (p= 0.032). There was no statistical difference in clinical outcome between these subgroups.
Conclusions: The Vici Venous Stent® placed in the ilio-femoral vein segment in patients with symptomatic VOO revealed no safety issues, had excellent primary patency and substantial symptom improvement. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate the durability of this stenting procedure.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a000731 | DOI Listing |
Pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) is an insidious diagnosis associated with morbidity and mortality. Pharmacologic therapy may suffice initially, but advanced stages demand mechanical intervention. Pulmonary stent implantation (PSI) and pulmonary balloon angioplasty (PBA) are common strategies, both carrying restenosis risks.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFAnn Ital Chir
January 2025
Institute of Central Nervous System Vascular Injury and Repair, Jining Medical Science Research Institute, The First People's Hospital of Jining, 272000 Jining, Shandong, China.
Aim: This study aims to report a rare case of an embolization protection device (EPD) entrapment during Carotid Artery Stent (CAS) and to discuss the management strategy, including open surgery and concurrent carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
Case Presentation: A 71-year-old female presented with left limb weakness and unclear speech following CAS. Imaging revealed a new cerebral infarction and right internal carotid artery stenosis.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
January 2025
German Aortic Centre, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart and Vascular Centre UKE Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Objective: Half of re-interventions after fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) are target vessel related. Regarding bridging stent choice, existing data are controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of Advanta V12/iCAST as bridging stent in FB-EVAR.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPrz Gastroenterol
September 2024
Ward of General Surgery, Regional Hospital, Sieradz, Poland.
Medicine (Baltimore)
November 2024
Department of Vascular Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University.
Stanford type B aortic dissection involving the left subclavian artery (LSA) poses significant clinical challenges. The Castor single-branch stent graft and in situ fenestration are commonly used techniques, but the better endovascular treatment remains debated. This study evaluates the clinical effects of the Castor single-branched stent graft versus in situ fenestration in treating Stanford type B aortic dissection involving the LSA.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!