Evaluation of the methodological quality of articles on autologous breast reconstruction.

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg

Epidemiology, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Georg-Brauchle-Ring 56, 80992 Munich, Germany. Electronic address:

Published: September 2018

Background: Breast cancer remains the most common cancer among women worldwide. Autologous breast reconstruction may contribute toward restoring body image and improving quality of life after mastectomy. This systematic literature review describes differences in the quality and type of studies investigating autologous breast reconstruction techniques over time.

Methods: MEDLINE was searched for articles related to the surgical techniques, namely, TRAM, LADO, DIEP, and SGAP/IGAP, for the periods 1970 to 2007 and 2008 to 2010. The quality and type of studies were compared across the two time periods. Full-texts were evaluated according to prespecified quality criteria.

Results: The MEDLINE searches yielded 1,057 articles for review; of them, 517 articles were excluded, and 314 had a completed quality criteria checklist and hence were included; of these 314 articles, 206 articles investigated TRAM flaps, 85 investigated LADO flaps, 74 investigated DIEP flaps, and 6 investigated SGAP/IGAP flaps. A total of 218 articles were published between 1970 and 2007 compared to 96 articles published between 2008 and 2010. The comparison of quality scores between the two time periods showed a shift toward higher scores in the period 2008 to 2010. The DIEP technique was investigated more frequently between 2008 and 2010 than between 1970 and 2007, whereas the percentage of articles focusing on the TRAM flap decreased. The percentage of articles investigating the LADO and SGAP/IGAP techniques remained constant across the time periods.

Conclusions: Results relating to the methodological quality of articles on breast reconstruction with autologous tissue show that the quality of publications has improved with time, whereas research interests concerning the type of surgical technique investigated have changed in focus.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2018.05.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

breast reconstruction
16
2008 2010
16
autologous breast
12
1970 2007
12
flaps investigated
12
articles
11
quality
9
methodological quality
8
quality articles
8
quality type
8

Similar Publications

Silicone breast implants (SBIs) are commonly used for breast reconstruction and cosmetic surgery. However, long-term complications associated with SBI, such as rupture and infection, require careful monitoring. Here, we report a case in which coronavirus disease 2019 infection led to immunosuppression and secondary bacterial infection, resulting in skin ulceration and eventual removal of the SBI.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: This study evaluates the hypothesis that a volumetric skin-sparing planning technique (SSPT) will reduce acute dermatitis in patients treated to the breast or chest wall (CW) with proton pencil-beam scanning (PBS).

Methods And Materials: In January 2022, our center incorporated volumetric-based skin-sparing objectives in addition to skin hot spot evaluation as an SSPT. The SSPT incorporated an objective to limit the volume of a skin evaluation structure (skin-eval) receiving 95% of the prescription dose or more (V95%Rx) to ideally < 50%.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Prepectoral (PP) immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is gaining popularity over the retropectoral (RP) breast reconstruction technique. This study aims to compare complication rates across different body mass index (BMI) groups in patients undergoing PP or RP IBBR.

Methods: A monocentric retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent mastectomy and IBBR from January 2018 to December 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We present an approach for evaluating abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans that generates reproducible measures relevant to donor site morbidity after abdominally based breast reconstruction. Seventeen preoperative CT metrics were measured in 20 patients with software: interanterior superior iliac spine distance; abdominal wall protrusion; interrectus distance; rectus abdominis width, thickness, and width-to-thickness ratio; abdominal wall thickness; subcutaneous fat volume; visceral fat volume; right/left psoas volumes and densities; and right/left rectus abdominis volumes and densities. Two operators performed measures to determine interrater reliability (n = 10).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!