Aims/hypothesis: Our aim was to investigate amputation-free survival in people at high risk for foot ulceration in diabetes ('high-risk foot'), and to compare different subcategories of high-risk foot.

Methods: Overall, 17,353 people with diabetes and high-risk foot from January 2008 to December 2011 were identified from the Scotland-wide diabetes register (Scottish Care Information-Diabetes: N = 247,278). Participants were followed-up for up to 2 years from baseline and were categorised into three groups: (1) those with no previous ulcer, (2) those with an active ulcer or (3) those with a healed previous ulcer. Participants with prior minor or major amputation were excluded. Accelerated failure time models were used to compare amputation-free survival up to 2 years between the three exposure groups.

Results: The 2 year amputation-free survival rate in all people with diabetes with high-risk foot was 84.5%. In this study group, 270 people (10.0%) had an amputation and 2424 (90.0%) died during the 2 year follow-up period. People who had active and healed previous ulcers at baseline had significantly lower 2 year amputation-free survival compared with those who had no previous ulcer (both p < 0.0001). The percentage of people who died within 2 years for those with healed ulcer, active ulcer or no baseline ulcer was 22.8%, 16% and 12.1%, respectively.

Conclusions/interpretation: In people judged to be at high risk of foot ulceration, the risk of death was up to nine times the risk of amputation. Death rates were higher for people with diabetes who had healed ulcers than for those with active ulcers. However, people with active ulcers had the highest risk of amputation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6223842PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00125-018-4723-yDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

amputation-free survival
20
previous ulcer
12
17353 people
8
people high
8
high risk
8
risk foot
8
foot ulceration
8
ulceration diabetes
8
people diabetes
8
diabetes high-risk
8

Similar Publications

Safety and efficacy of chocolate balloon in the treatment of infrapopliteal artery disease.

CVIR Endovasc

January 2025

Department of Vascular Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of chocolate balloons in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and infrapopliteal artery disease, and compare them with conventional balloons.

Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 167 patients with CLTI and infrapopliteal who underwent endovascular intervention with or without chocolate balloons from September 1, 2019 to June 30, 2023. The primary endpoint was amputation-free survival (AFS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The 2019 Global Vascular Guidelines recommend risk assessment for evidence based revascularization based on the acronym PLAN; Patient risk, Limb severity and ANatomical complexity of disease. This meta-analysis compares a multitude of prognostic tests within these categories.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of tests that estimated 1 year major event (amputation free survival and major adverse limb events) probability.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Effects of dialysis on peripheral arterial disease.

Semin Vasc Surg

December 2024

Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, University of Vermont Medical Center, 111 Colchester Avenue, Smith 338, Burlington, VT 05401. Electronic address:

End-stage renal disease is an independent risk factor for the development of peripheral arterial disease, with considerably worse outcomes in patients with concomitant diseases. It is important to realize the widespread, yet frequently asymptomatic, nature of peripheral arterial disease in patients with end-stage renal disease due to the presence of other comorbidities that decrease activity levels and sensation to allow for early recognition and timely medical management to try and mitigate otherwise poor outcomes. Despite their high risk, properly selected patients derive benefit from revascularization; both open and endovascular approaches provide similar outcomes in terms of overall survival, amputation-free survival, and limb salvage, with perhaps a slight preference toward open repair.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * Data from 356 patients were analyzed, revealing that the 30-day amputation rates were comparable between PF (12.5%) and NPF (10%) groups, but PF patients had significantly lower overall survival rates within 30 days and long-term (1 and 5 years) compared to NPF.
  • * Additionally, wound infection rates were higher in the PF group (5.5%) than in the NPF group (1.7%), suggesting
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Urgent revascularization should be performed to patients with acute limb ischemia (ALI) unless the ischemia is irreversible. In patients with severe ALI and multiple morbidities, surgical revascularization is not feasible; however, endovascular revascularization (EVR) may be an option. This study aimed to examine 1-year clinical outcomes of EVR in patients with ALI and determine prognostic factors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!