A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A retrospective systematic data review on the use of a polihexanide-containing product on burns in children. | LitMetric

A retrospective systematic data review on the use of a polihexanide-containing product on burns in children.

J Tissue Viability

Klinik für Kinderchirurgie und Kinderurologie, Amsterdamer Str. 59, 50735 Cologne, Germany.

Published: November 2018

Background: It is current practice for physicians to use the Prontosan range of products in children based on their personal clinical experience, despite the lack of safety data in this population. This retrospective data review was designed to obtain information on the safety profile of the Prontosan range of products in children in routine clinical practice.

Methods: Data from newborns, infants and children with burns treated with the Prontosan range were collected retrospectively from patient medical records.

Results: The majority of children treated for burns (80.1%) were under the age of four. More boys than girls were subject to burn injury (58.1% vs. 41.9%). The majority of burns (74.7%) were partial thickness burn (IIa and IIb). Safety was analysed based on the adverse events/reactions, infections and interactions/symptoms related to Prontosan reported in the CRFs. AEs were reported in five children after the use of Prontosan products: itching (3 cases), rash (1 case) and hypergranulating tissue (1 case). No event was severe and all events resolved favourably with good healing results. In addition, 11 patients developed clinical signs of infection during treatment (mainly Staphylococcus aureus).

Conclusions: The Prontosan range of products is demonstrated as safe and tolerable for use in children as part of burn treatment. Inclusion of this range of products in the protocol of paediatric burn care allows a good healing process starting with appropriate wound cleansing and maintaining moist wound environment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2018.08.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prontosan range
16
range products
16
data review
8
products children
8
good healing
8
children
7
prontosan
6
range
5
products
5
retrospective systematic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!