One-Year Outcomes after PCI Strategies in Cardiogenic Shock.

N Engl J Med

From Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig (H.T., M.S., A.J., S.D.), Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim (I.A.), University Heart Center Lübeck, Lübeck (S.W.-T., R.M.-S., G.F., I.E.), German Center for Cardiovascular Research (I.A., S.W.-T., R.M.-S., G.F., I.E., U.L., C.S., A.J., S.B.F., S.D.) and Universitätsklinikum Charité, Campus Benjamin Franklin (U.L., C.S.), Berlin, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg (P.N.), Klinikum der Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Tübingen (T. Geisler), Klinikum Links der Weser, Bremen (A.F.), Helios Klinik Erfurt, Erfurt (H.L.), Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, Greifswald (S.B.F.), Universitäres Herzzentrum Regensburg, Regensburg (L.S.M.), and Institut für Herzinfarktforschung (S. Schneider, U.Z.) and Klinikum Ludwigshafen (U.Z.), Ludwigshafen - all in Germany; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam (J.J.P.); University Medical Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia (M.N., T. Goslar); Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland (J.S.); Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom (K.O.); Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos and Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania (P.S.); Sorbonne Université Paris 6, ACTION Study Group, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière (G.M., O.B.), and Applied Research, Technology Transfer, Industrial Collaboration, Société par Actions Simplifiée (P.T.), Paris; Wilhelminenpital, Department of Cardiology, and Sigmund Freud University, Medical School, Vienna (K.H.); the Department of Cardiology, Inselspital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland (S.W., L.H.); Manzoni Hospital, Lecco, Italy (S. Savonitto); and Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium (C.V.).

Published: November 2018

Background: Among patients with acute myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, and multivessel coronary artery disease, the risk of a composite of death from any cause or severe renal failure leading to renal-replacement therapy at 30 days was found to be lower with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the culprit lesion only than with immediate multivessel PCI. We evaluated clinical outcomes at 1 year.

Methods: We randomly assigned 706 patients to either culprit-lesion-only PCI or immediate multivessel PCI. The results for the primary end point of death or renal-replacement therapy at 30 days have been reported previously. Prespecified secondary end points at 1 year included death from any cause, recurrent myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, rehospitalization for congestive heart failure, the composite of death or recurrent infarction, and the composite of death, recurrent infarction, or rehospitalization for heart failure.

Results: As reported previously, at 30 days, the primary end point had occurred in 45.9% of the patients in the culprit-lesion-only PCI group and in 55.4% in the multivessel PCI group (P=0.01). At 1 year, death had occurred in 172 of 344 patients (50.0%) in the culprit-lesion-only PCI group and in 194 of 341 patients (56.9%) in the multivessel PCI group (relative risk, 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 1.01). The rate of recurrent infarction was 1.7% with culprit-lesion-only PCI and 2.1% with multivessel PCI (relative risk, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.29 to 2.50), and the rate of a composite of death or recurrent infarction was 50.9% and 58.4%, respectively (relative risk, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.00). Repeat revascularization occurred more frequently with culprit-lesion-only PCI than with multivessel PCI (in 32.3% of the patients vs. 9.4%; relative risk, 3.44; 95% CI, 2.39 to 4.95), as did rehospitalization for heart failure (5.2% vs. 1.2%; relative risk, 4.46; 95% CI, 1.53 to 13.04).

Conclusions: Among patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock, the risk of death or renal-replacement therapy at 30 days was lower with culprit-lesion-only PCI than with immediate multivessel PCI, and mortality did not differ significantly between the two groups at 1 year of follow-up. (Funded by the European Union Seventh Framework Program and others; CULPRIT-SHOCK ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01927549 .).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1808788DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

multivessel pci
28
culprit-lesion-only pci
24
relative risk
20
composite death
16
death recurrent
16
recurrent infarction
16
pci group
16
pci
15
cardiogenic shock
12
myocardial infarction
12

Similar Publications

Diffuse coronary artery disease (CAD) impacts the immediate hemodynamic and clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We evaluated whether the diffuse pattern of CAD derived from angiographic Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) impacts the immediate hemodynamic outcome post-PCI and the medium term predicted vessel-oriented composite endpoint (VOCE). Paired pre-procedure QFRs were assessed in 503 patients and 1022 vessels in the Multivessel TALENT (MVT) trial.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Myocardial infarction in multivessel disease: Does presence of chronic total occlusion make a difference?

Int J Cardiol

January 2025

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic; Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.

Background And Aims: Myocardial infarction (MI) in multivessel disease (MVD) and chronic total occlusion (CTO) is associated with high mortality. However, all-cause mortality of matched cohort without a CTO is unclear. Our aim was to analyse clinical characteristics, presenting symptoms, and survival of patients with MI in MVD and the possible impact of CTO on 1-year mortality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease, most but not all randomized trials have reported that complete revascularization (CR) offers advantages over culprit vessel-only revascularization. In addition, the optimal timing and assessment methods for CR remain undetermined.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify the optimal revascularization strategy in patients with STEMI and multivessel disease, using a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The therapeutic management of patients with multivessel disease and severe left ventricular dysfunction is complex and controversial.

Aims: The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical outcomes and the changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and at least one chronic total occlusion (CTO) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with hemodynamic support provided by Impella.

Methods: Retrospective, multicenter study enrolling patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and severe coronary artery disease with at least one CTO who required percutaneous mechanical circulatory support with Impella, from January 2019 to December 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Backgrounds: Post-dilatation after stenting with a non-compliant (NC) balloon can be used to improve overall percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) result. Due to lack of evidence on the effect of post-dilatation on adverse clinical endpoints there is no consensus whether post-dilatation should be used routinely. The aim of the current study was to determine the contemporary practice of post-dilatation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!