Aims: Instantaneous free-wave ratio (iFR) has been recently demonstrated non-inferior to fractional flow reserve (FFR) to drive coronary revascularization; however, no study has compared iFR versus coronary angiography (CA). We performed a network meta-analysis to evaluate efficacy and safety of iFR- versus CA-guided strategy.
Methods And Results: We searched for randomized trials and studies with propensity score matching in The Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, and MEDLINE/Pubmed. CA, FFR, and iFR were the three competitive arms, MACE (a composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction [MI], and target vessel revascularization [TVR]) was the primary endpoint, while its single components the secondary ones. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients presenting with stable coronary artery disease. Eight studies were selected: 4126 patients were evaluated with FFR, 2160 with iFR, and 2214 with CA, acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was the most frequent admission diagnosis. After 12 months, rates of MACE and all-cause death did not differ between groups (respectively OR 1.04 and OR 0.86 for iFR vs FFR). Both FFR and iFR reduced TVR compared to CA (respectively OR 0.68 and OR 0.70). In patients with stable CAD both FFR and iFR reduced risk of subsequent MI compared to CA (respectively OR 0.66 and OR 0.79).
Conclusion: Compared to CA alone, both FFR and iFR are safe and effective in guiding coronary revascularization at 12 months. In patients with stable CAD, both FFR and iFR-guided revascularization reduce the risk of subsequent MI at 12 months.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joic.12551 | DOI Listing |
Cardiovasc Revasc Med
December 2024
Stanford University, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address:
In this review article, we provide an overview of the definition and application of fractional flow reserve (FFR), instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), coronary flow reserve (CFR), and index of microvascular resistance (IMR) in the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of coronary microvascular dysfunction. We discuss their respective limitations as it relates to microvascular dysfunction. In each section, we review the most recent evidence supporting their use in microvascular and epicardial coronary artery disease.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInt J Numer Method Biomed Eng
January 2025
College of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.
The accurate non-invasive detection and estimation of central aortic pressure waveforms (CAPW) are crucial for reliable treatments of cardiovascular system diseases. But the accuracy and practicality of current estimation methods need to be improved. Our study combines a meta-learning neural network and a physics-driven method to accurately estimate CAPW based on personalized physiological indicators.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCatheter Cardiovasc Interv
January 2025
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medical Science, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Introduction: In patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS), the benefit of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) added to optimal medical therapy (OMT) remains unclear. The indication to PCI may be driven either by angiographic evaluation or ischemia assessment, thus depicting different potential strategies which have not yet been thoroughly compared.
Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing OMT versus PCI angio-guided or versus PCI non-invasive or invasive ischemia guided were identified and compared via network meta-analysis.
Int J Cardiol
December 2024
Cardiothoracic and Vascular Department (DICATOV), IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Int J Cardiol
February 2025
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!