Reproducibility of antimicrobial test methods.

Sci Rep

Center for Biofilm Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA.

Published: August 2018

We review reproducibility results for methods that test antimicrobial efficacy against biofilms, spores and bacteria dried onto a surface. Our review, that included test results for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Salmonella choleraesuis and Bacillus subtilis, suggests that the level of reproducibility depends on the efficacy of the antimicrobial agent being tested for each microbe and microbial environment. To determine the reproducibility of a method, several laboratories must independently test the same antimicrobial agent using the method. Little variability among the efficacy results suggests good reproducibility. Such reproducibility assessments currently are hampered by the absence of an objective process for deciding whether the variability is sufficiently small. We present a quantitative decision process that objectively determines whether any method that assesses antimicrobial efficacy is reproducible. Because the perception of acceptable reproducibility may differ among stakeholders, the decision process is governed by a stakeholder's specifications that necessarily includes the efficacy of the agents to be tested.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6105646PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30282-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

test antimicrobial
8
antimicrobial efficacy
8
antimicrobial agent
8
decision process
8
reproducibility
7
efficacy
5
reproducibility antimicrobial
4
test
4
antimicrobial test
4
test methods
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!