A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The treatment of ingrown nail: Chemical matricectomy with NAOH versus wedge resection. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study compares two methods for treating ingrown nails: wedge resection and chemical matricectomy with NaOH.
  • The results show that chemical matricectomy takes significantly less time for both the operation and recovery compared to wedge resection.
  • Both methods have similar recurrence rates, indicating they are equally effective, with chemical matricectomy offering quicker recovery as its main advantage.

Article Abstract

Ingrown nail is a common problem seen in the dermatology clinics. The aim of this study is to compare the wedge resection method and chemical matricectomy with NaOH in terms of operation time, postoperative pain severity, postoperative drainage, recurrence rates, recovery time, and the effects of these two methods on Dermatology Quality of Life Index. This study included 60 patients. About 42 nail edges of 30 patients were treated with NaOH for chemical matricectomy and wedge resection was performed for 33 nail edges of 30 patients. Operation time for chemical matricectomy and wedge resection was an average of 7.66 ± 3.65 and 19.25 ± 5.54 min (p < .001). Recovery time was an average of 17.27 ± 14.22 days for chemical matricectomy and an average of 28.85 ± 17.03 days for wedge resection (p = .004). Recurrence was detected in 5.4% of the nail edges treated with chemical matricectomy and 3.6% of the nail edges treated with wedge resection (p = 1.000). Absence of differences for the recurrence rates between wedge resection method and chemical matricectomy method with NaOH shows that effectiveness of these approaches are similar. It seems that quite short operation and recovery times in the chemical matricectomy are the main advantage of the method.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dth.12677DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

chemical matricectomy
16
wedge resection
16
ingrown nail
8
matricectomy naoh
8
operation time
8
nail edges
8
edges patients
8
matricectomy wedge
8
treatment ingrown
4
nail
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!