Differentiating Extensor Plantar Response in Pathological and Normal Population.

Ann Indian Acad Neurol

Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Published: January 2018

AI Article Synopsis

  • Approximately 5%-11% of neurologically normal individuals exhibit an extensor plantar response (EPR), prompting a study to distinguish between physiological and pathological EPRs.
  • The study involved 43 patients with pyramidal lesions and 113 healthy controls, revealing that pathological EPRs were significantly more reproducible and sensitive to stimulation compared to those in normal subjects.
  • A scoring system based on specific features of EPR was developed, showing that a score of 3 or higher effectively indicates a pathological origin, with notable sensitivity and specificity.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Approximately 5%-11% of neurologically normal population has extensor plantar response (EPR).

Method: This study is aimed to identify differentiating features of EPR between physiological and pathological population.

Results: A total of 43 patients with pyramidal lesions and 113 normal controls were recruited for this study. The pathological EPRs were more reproducible, with 89.4% having at least two positive Babinski responses and 91.5% having two positive Chaddock responses (vs. 14.3% and 4.8% in controls, < 0.001). The pathological EPR was more sensitive to stimulation, in which 89.1% were elicited when the stimulation reached mid-lateral sole (vs. 11.9% in controls, < 0.001). Most (93.6%) pathological cases had sustained big toe extension throughout stimulation (vs. 73.8% in controls, < 0.001). As compared to those with brain lesion, the plantar responses in those with spinal lesion are less likely to have ankle dorsiflexion (5.3% vs. 25%, < 0.05) more likely to have sustained extensor response with Babinski (94.7% vs. 71.4%, < 0.05), Chaddock (89.5% vs. 64.3%, < 0.05), and Schaefer (26.3% vs. 3.6%, < 0.05) methods. A scoring system was computed using four variables, i.e., two consecutive positive Babinski or Chaddock responses, extensor response at mid-lateral sole, and sustained extension throughout stimulation. A score ≥3 is predictive of pathological origin, with sensitivity and specificity of 78.7% and 95.2%, respectively.

Conclusion: The pathological EPR is more reproducible, sensitive to stimulation, and sustainable compared to physiological extensor response.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6073965PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aian.AIAN_254_17DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

controls 0001
12
extensor response
12
extensor plantar
8
plantar response
8
normal population
8
positive babinski
8
chaddock responses
8
pathological epr
8
sensitive stimulation
8
mid-lateral sole
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!