General Surgery Prioritization Tool: a pilot study.

ANZ J Surg

Canterbury District Health Board, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Published: December 2018

Background: The prioritization of elective surgical wait-lists remains a contentious issue. Multiple new tools and systems have been developed to attempt to reliably prioritize patients. This study pilots one such system, the General Surgery Prioritization Tool and compares it to the existing triage system of clinical judgement. The aim was to determine if the new tool reflects clinical judgement. Secondary aims were to assess for any bias in its application to different patient groups or its application by different scorers.

Method: A cohort of 392 patients was identified who were wait-listed for non-cancer elective surgery between July 2015 and February 2016. The General Surgery Prioritization Tool was applied after traditional prioritization using clinical judgement. The scores produced by the new tool were compared to the clinical judgement categories. Differences in scores based on gender, ethnicity, age, surgical condition and surgeon were then analysed.

Results: There was statistically significant correlation in the new tool scores with traditional triage groups (P < 0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences in mean scores attributable to gender, age or ethnicity. There were minimal differences in mean scores between common surgical conditions. Except for one outlier the mean scores were consistent across 17 surgeons.

Conclusion: This pilot study has found the General Surgery Prioritization Tool to reflect clinical judgement and to be generalizable by age, gender, ethnicity and prioritizing surgeon. The tool is at least as clinically reliable as traditional methods in the triage for elective general surgery with the advantage of being a more explicit process.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.14703DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

general surgery
20
clinical judgement
20
surgery prioritization
16
prioritization tool
16
differences scores
12
tool
8
pilot study
8
gender ethnicity
8
prioritization
6
scores
6

Similar Publications

Background: Primary luminal breast cancer cells lose their identity rapidly in standard tissue culture, which is problematic for testing hormone interventions and molecular pathways specific to the luminal subtype. Breast cancer organoids are thought to retain tumor characteristics better, but long-term viability of luminal-subtype cases is a persistent challenge. Our goal was to adapt short-term organoids of luminal breast cancer for parallel testing of genetic and pharmacologic perturbations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) belongs to the worst prognosis of breast cancer subtype probably because of distant metastasis to other organs, e.g. lungs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was found first in Wuhan and declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. Coinfection with other respiratory viruses may occur, complicating the diagnosis and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 . Herein, we identified a Karolinska Institute polyomavirus Stockholm 60 present in a nasopharyngeal swab of a patient with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection using next-generation sequencing with an enrichment method.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Megakaryocyte in sepsis: the trinity of coagulation, inflammation and immunity.

Crit Care

December 2024

Medical Innovation Research Division and Fourth Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Trauma and Chemical Poisoning, Beijing, 100853, China.

Background: Megakaryocytes are traditionally recognized as cells responsible for platelet production. However, beyond their role in thrombopoiesis, megakaryocytes also participate in inflammatory responses and regulate immune system functions. Sepsis, characterized by life-threatening organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated response to infection, prominently features coagulopathy, severe inflammation, and immune dysfunction as key pathophysiological aspects.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Interpretation and classification of FBN1 variants associated with Marfan syndrome: consensus recommendations from the Clinical Genome Resource's FBN1 variant curation expert panel.

Genome Med

December 2024

European Reference Network for Rare Multisystemic Vascular Disease (VASCERN), HTAD and MSA Rare Disease, Working Group, Paris, France.

Background: In 2015, the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) developed standardized variant curation guidelines for Mendelian disorders. Although these guidelines have been widely adopted, they are not gene- or disease-specific. To mitigate classification discrepancies, the Clinical Genome Resource FBN1 variant curation expert panel (VCEP) was established in 2018 to develop adaptations to the ACMG/AMP criteria for FBN1 in association with Marfan syndrome.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!