Background And Aim: Colorectal cancer patients often present with large bowel obstruction. Elective placement of a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) can relieve obstruction, but can be challenging. Previous studies have compared cases by outcomes only, but the present study investigated successful cases only to identify factors related to prolonged and difficult SEMS placement in patients with malignant colonic obstruction.

Methods: A post-hoc analysis of a multicenter clinical trial conducted between March 2012 and October 2013 at 46 facilities across Japan (UMIN000007953) was carried out; 511 patients who required SEMS placement for acute colorectal obstruction or symptomatic stricture secondary to malignant neoplasm were enrolled. Technical success rates and procedure times were recorded. Clinical and interventional parameters were investigated for their potential effect on procedure time by univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results: Technical success rate of SEMS placement was 98%. Median procedure time was 30 (range, 4-170) min. In 27% of patients, procedure time exceeded 45 min, indicating technically difficult placement. Multivariate analyses showed significant associations between technically difficult placement and a ColoRectal Obstruction Scoring System (CROSS) score of 0 before SEMS placement (odds ratio [OR], 1.6; P < 0.05), tumor site in the right colon (OR, 2.5; P < 0.0001), stricture length ≥5 cm (OR, 2.2; P < 0.001), peritoneal carcinomatosis (OR, 1.7; P < 0.05), and multiple SEMS placement (OR, 8.0; P < 0.01).

Conclusion: Clinicians must anticipate technical challenges in cases with peritoneal carcinomatosis, a CROSS score of 0, or expansive strictures; such cases require experienced clinicians to carry out SEMS placement.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7379649PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/den.13260DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sems placement
24
procedure time
12
placement
10
self-expandable metallic
8
metallic stent
8
malignant colonic
8
post-hoc analysis
8
analysis multicenter
8
colorectal obstruction
8
technical success
8

Similar Publications

Background And Aims: Self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) are effective in alleviating malignant colorectal obstruction. However, bowel perforation following SEMS placement remains a significant concern, as it can adversely affect oncological outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the recurrence and overall survival rates associated with SEMS-related bowel perforations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Esophageal cancer is the sixth most common cancer in India with a incidence of around 4.5%. Dysphagia is the primary manifestation of advanced esophageal cancer in 80%-90% of patients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The optimal surgical time after stent placement in obstructive colorectal cancer: impact on long-term survival of patients.

Tech Coloproctol

December 2024

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China.

Objective: To investigate the optimal interval between self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) placement and radical surgery in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer.

Method: In this study, a retrospective research design was used to select 125 patients with obstructive colorectal cancer who underwent colonoscopic SEMS placement with subsequent radical surgery between February 2011 and November 2022 at Shanghai Changhai Hospital. In addition, their clinical data and therapeutic efficacy were examined.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Aims: Self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) are effective for symptom palliation in patients with esophageal obstruction. However, their placement can lead to adverse events such as stent migration and restenosis. A novel fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS) with antimigration properties has been developed to address these issues.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) often requires fistula dilation owing to the placement of a large diameter of the delivery stent. The recently developed delivery devices, which are as thin as 5.9/6.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!