Practice-Based Research Networks and the Mandate for Real-World Evidence.

Am J Law Med

J.D., Ph.D.; Professor of Law; Associate Dean for Research & Innovation, James E. Rogers College of Law, University of Arizona.

Published: May 2018

The 21 Century Cures Act encourages the Food and Drug Administration to consider "real-world evidence" in its regulation of the safety and efficacy of drugs and devices. Many have interpreted this mandate to focus on non-randomized observational research. However, we suggest that regulatory science must also move from rarefied academic hospitals to community-based settings, where the vast majority of patients in fact receive care in the fragmented U.S. healthcare system. This move is especially important if innovations are to reach, and be validated in, more diverse populations. A solution can be found in the 183 Practiced-Based Research Networks ("PBRN"), i.e., groups of primary care clinicians and practices in all 50 states working to improve clinical care and translate research findings into practice. This symposium contribution seeks to (1) describe some of the common shortcomings of clinical trials, (2) explore the opportunities and challenges posed by use of real-world evidence as a basis for drug and device regulation, (3) briefly describe the history and evolution of PBRNs, and (4) articulate the challenges and opportunities for using PBRNs to fulfill the 21 Century Cures Act mandate for real-world evidence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0098858818789428DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

real-world evidence
12
mandate real-world
8
century cures
8
practice-based networks
4
networks mandate
4
evidence century
4
cures encourages
4
encourages food
4
food drug
4
drug administration
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!