Purpose: Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in treatment of bladder and urethral stones was not precisely determined. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of SWL versus visual cystolitholapaxy in the management of calcular acute urine retention.

Methods: From March 2015 to February 2017, a randomised controlled study was conducted on 100 patients for whom urethral catheter fixed for acute retention of urine due to urethral or vesical radio-opaque stone(s) ≤ 2 cm. Patients were randomised to either SWL group (n = 50) or visual cystolitholapaxy (endoscopy group) (n = 50).

Results: No statistically significant differences between the pre-operative parameters of both groups were found. The mean stone diameter was 12.2 ± 3 mm and 12.2 ± 3.2 mm in SWL and endoscopy groups, respectively (p value = 0.4). The overall success rates of SWL group were 94% (47 of 50 patients) and endoscopy group were 98% (49 of 50 patients). SWL failed in 3 patients (6%); these 3 patients underwent cystolitholapaxy and were rendered free of stones. Intra-operative and post-operative complications were comparable between both groups (p value = 0.5 and 1, respectively). One patient had bladder perforation in the endoscopy group and was managed conservatively.

Conclusions: SWL mono-therapy is safe, non-invasive and as effective as visual cystolitholapaxy in management of patients presenting with acute urine retention by vesical or urethral stones 2 cm or less and could be useful for patients unwilling/unfit for general anaesthesia.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2434-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cystolitholapaxy management
12
visual cystolitholapaxy
12
endoscopy group
12
patients
9
shock wave
8
wave lithotripsy
8
management patients
8
patients presenting
8
calcular acute
8
randomised controlled
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study examines bladder stone treatment trends in Germany from 2006 to 2020, focusing on data from a national hospital billing database.
  • The number of therapeutic interventions for lower urinary tract stones rose significantly, with transurethral cystolithotripsy (TUCL) becoming the most commonly performed procedure.
  • While TUCL's popularity increased, the overall use of open cystolithotomy and the combination of TUCL with prostate resection saw a decrease, indicating shifts in treatment practices.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Recent studies suggest that surgical intervention for benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) may not be necessary during bladder stone removal in men, prompting an evaluation of this approach.
  • A study analyzed 63 males who underwent bladder stone removal without simultaneous BPO surgery from 2017 to 2024, tracking outcomes such as future BPO surgery and complications.
  • The findings indicated a high rate of BPO surgery-free survival (90% at 1 year, 78% at 3 and 5 years), with larger prostate volumes and higher post-void residual being significant predictors for needing future BPO surgery, highlighting the importance of careful patient selection.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Spina bifida is a congenital condition that often leads to significant urological complications, including an increased risk of kidney and bladder stones. Performing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) on patients with spina bifida presents unique challenges due to the anatomical deformities. We present a case of a spina bifida patient with right staghorn stone and bladder stones in a previously augmented bladder.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: The study aim was to analyze the presentation, management, and follow-up of renal transplant patients developing bladder calculi.

Methods: Patients who underwent renal transplant with postoperative follow-up at our institution were retrospectively analyzed (1984-2023) to assess for the development of posttransplant bladder stones. All bladder stones were identified by computerized tomography imaging and stone size was measured using this imaging modality.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are an internationally recognized strategy for reducing antimicrobial resistance while maintaining patient safety. ASP activities include the restriction of broad-spectrum antibiotics, the establishment of hospital guidelines based on antibiograms, and the promotion of appropriate antibiotic use. This study aimed to determine whether the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship practices improved the effects of a peri-procedure antibiotic prophylaxis prescribed by urologists for patients with spinal cord injury/disease (SCI/D) undergoing minor urological procedures at a tertiary care hospital.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!