Background: Few contemporary studies have assessed the management and outcomes of patients with massive and submassive pulmonary embolism. Given advances in therapy, we report contemporary practice patterns and event rates among these patients.
Methods: We analyzed a prospective database of patients with massive and submassive pulmonary embolism. We report clinical characteristics, therapies, and outcomes stratified by pulmonary embolism type. Treatment escalation beyond systemic anticoagulation was defined as advanced therapy. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify predictors of 90-day mortality.
Results: Among 338 patients, 46 (13.6%) presented with massive and 292 (86.4%) with submassive pulmonary embolism. The average age was 63 ± 15 years, 49.9% were female, 32.0% had malignancy, and 21.9% had recent surgery. Massive pulmonary embolism patients received advanced therapy in 71.7% (30.4% systemic thrombolysis, 17.4% catheter-directed thrombolysis, 15.2% surgical embolectomy) and had greater 90-day mortality rates compared with submassive pulmonary embolism patients (41.3% vs 12.3%, respectively; P < .01). Most massive pulmonary embolism deaths (78.9%) occurred in-hospital, whereas mortality risk persisted after discharge for submassive pulmonary embolism. After multivariable adjustment, massive pulmonary embolism was associated with a 5.23-fold greater hazard of mortality (95% confidence interval, 2.70-10.13; P < .01). Advanced therapies among all pulmonary embolism patients were associated with a 61% reduction in mortality (95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.76; P < .01).
Conclusions: Among contemporary massive and submassive pulmonary embolism patients, mortality remains substantial. Advanced therapies were frequently utilized and independently associated with lower mortality. Further investigation is needed to determine how to improve outcomes among these high-risk patients, including the optimal use of advanced therapies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.07.035 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Venous thromboembolism in bullous pemphigoid: current evidence and update on systematic review.
Dermatol Reports
January 2025
Dermatology, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh.
Various studies have shown that individuals with bullous pemphigoid (BP) are more likely to develop venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, it is important to acknowledge that these studies primarily focused on individuals in Western nations, which restricts their generalization to a wider demographic. The present systematic review aims to assess the cumulative risk of VTE in individuals with BP compared to healthy individuals.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFComparison of ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy in intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism.
Vasa
January 2025
Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Pulmonary embolism (PE) can result in high mortality. Early risk stratification and treatment are critical for individualized management. In patients with intermediate-high-risk (IHR) PE, guidelines recommend to consider a percutaneous catheter-directed treatment (CDT).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIncidence and Risk of Thromboembolic and Cardiovascular Adverse Events with PARP Inhibitor Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Safety Meta-analysis.
Eur Urol Open Sci
February 2025
Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Background And Objective: PARP inhibitor (PARPi) treatment is an effective option for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). There are few data on the cardiovascular and thromboembolic safety of these agents in mCRPC, as cardiovascular and thromboembolic adverse events (AEs) are uncommon. Our aim was to analyze the incidence and risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), thromboembolic events, and hypertension with PARPi therapy in mCRPC.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe impact of a patient advisory board on a clinical comparative effectiveness trial: a comparison of patient and researcher perspectives.
J Comp Eff Res
January 2025
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedics, Lebanon, NH, USA.
To examine contributions of a patient advisory board (PAB) to the design and conduct of The Pulmonary Embolism Prevention after Hip and Knee Replacement (PEPPER) Trial (NCT02810704) and compare perceptions of PAB members and researchers on the Trial. This evaluation of the PAB was conducted by Clinical Coordinating Center (CCC) members who first discussed PAB contributions, leading to the design of a semi-structured WebEx interview individually querying PAB members on their experience. Two study team members analyzed transcriptions of the interviews for common themes, which were discussed and affirmed at an in-person meeting with PAB members.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!