Recovery of latent fingermarks from brass cartridge cases: Evaluation of developers, analysis of surfaces and internal ballistic effects.

A study was undertaken wherein different fingermark developers were evaluated for the recovery of fingermarks from brass cartridge cases, besides the evaluation of factors such as firing effects and surface characterization of the cases. The latent fingermarks on α-brass plates, fired and unfired cartridge cases were deposited and aged for 1-14days before development with different developers. In order to mimic the fired cartridge case conditions, the brass plates were heated and examined at room temperature (RT), at 63 and at 200°C. The sequential treatment with cyanoacrylate, gun blue and fluorescent dye has been found to be the best among other developers for the recovery of latent fingermarks on brass surfaces including fired and unfired cartridge cases. Cartridge cases and other brass surfaces were also analyzed by surface characterization methods, including X-ray diffraction, scanning electronic microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and metallographic examination. The tested surfaces correspond to α-phase brass CuZn composition and have shown different surface morphologies (such as grain structure) and different levels of oxidation, even for cartridge cases obtained from the same batch. Due to this, the effectiveness of a given reagent for a specific brass surface is uncertain. Therefore, the application of the entire tested sequence of developers is strongly recommended. Further, the effects of firing on fingermarks on cartridge cases were examined, and the results indicated that the blowback of hot gases through the looseness between cartridge case and chamber wall of the firearm is the main cause responsible for deterioration of fingermarks during firing. Despite the recognized damage caused to fingermarks by the firing effects, good quality fingermarks were recovered from fired cartridge cases in which full fingermarks were intentionally deposited prior to firing. This indicates that the handling of the cartridges before and during the loading of the gun may have a strong influence on the quantity and quality of fingermarks, and that the firing itself is not the main responsible factor for the absence or low quality of fingermarks, as frequently reported in fired cartridge cases studies.