AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to enhance the detection of corneal ectasia susceptibility using tomographic data collected from multiple clinics across South America, the U.S., and Europe.
  • Researchers developed AI models using Pentacam HR parameters to analyze preoperative data from different patient groups, including stable LASIK cases, those with post-LASIK ectasia, and patients with keratoconus.
  • The newly created Pentacam Random Forest Index (PRFI) showed superior accuracy in diagnosing ectasia compared to existing methods, suggesting that incorporating more corneal biomechanical data could further improve risk assessment.

Article Abstract

Purpose: To improve the detection of corneal ectasia susceptibility using tomographic data.

Design: Multicenter case-control study.

Methods: Data from patients from 5 different clinics from South America, the United States, and Europe were evaluated. Artificial intelligence (AI) models were generated using Pentacam HR (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) parameters to discriminate the preoperative data of 3 groups: stable laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) cases (2980 patients with minimum follow-up of 7 years), ectasia susceptibility (71 eyes of 45 patients that developed post-LASIK ectasia [PLE]), and clinical keratoconus (KC; 182 patients). Model accuracy was independently tested in a different set of stable LASIK cases (298 patients with minimum follow-up of 4 years) and in 188 unoperated patients with very asymmetric ectasia (VAE); these patients presented normal topography (VAE-NT) in 1 eye and clinically diagnosed ectasia in the other (VAE-E). Accuracy was evaluated with ROC curves.

Results: The random forest (RF) provided highest accuracy among AI models in this sample with 100% sensitivity for clinical ectasia (KC+VAE-E; cutoff 0.52), being named Pentacam Random Forest Index (PRFI). Considering all cases, the PRFI had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.992 (94.2% sensitivity, 98.8% specificity; cutoff 0.216), being statistically higher than the Belin/Ambrósio deviation (BAD-D; AUC = 0.960, 87.3% sensitivity, 97.5% specificity; P = .006, DeLong's test). The optimized cutoff of 0.125 provided sensitivity of 85.2% for VAE-NT and 80% for PLE, with 96.6% specificity.

Conclusion: The PRFI enhances ectasia diagnosis. Further integrations with corneal biomechanical parameters and with the corneal impact from laser vision correction are needed for assessing ectasia risk.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2018.08.005DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ectasia
9
corneal ectasia
8
artificial intelligence
8
ectasia susceptibility
8
lasik cases
8
patients minimum
8
minimum follow-up
8
follow-up years
8
random forest
8
patients
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!