Background: Understanding which therapeutic innovations in diabetes represent the best value requires rigorous economic evaluation. Data from randomised controlled trials and observational studies indicate that insulin degludec has a hypoglycemia advantage versus insulin glargine 100 units/mL (glargine U100), the most widely prescribed basal insulin analogue in the UK. This analysis was done to more rigorously assess cost-effectiveness in a UK setting.

Methods: Data from two double-blinded, randomised, two-period crossover trials in type 1 (SWITCH 1) and type 2 (SWITCH 2) diabetes mellitus were used to assess the cost-effectiveness of degludec vs. glargine U100 with an economic model. Cost-effectiveness was analysed over a 1-year time horizon based on the different rates of hypoglycaemia and actual doses of insulin used, rather than glycaemic control due to the treat-to-target trial design.

Results: In type 1 diabetes mellitus, degludec was highly cost-effective compared with glargine U100, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £984 (increased costs of only £23/year and improvement in participant health of 0.0232 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs)). In type 2 diabetes mellitus, it was estimated that quality of life was improved (0.0065 QALYs gain) with degludec compared with glargine U100 at an increased annual cost of £117 (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, £17,939). One-way sensitivity analyses showed that the results were robust to changes in parameters in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Conclusions: The rigorous design of the SWITCH trials, coupled with a representative patient population and a definition of hypoglycaemia that is relevant for real-world patients, makes the results of these trials highly generalisable. The within-trial analysis has the added value of being able to include doses and event rates directly from the trials. This short-term economic analysis estimated that IDeg would be cost-effective relative to IGlar U100 in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in the UK.

Trial Registration: SWITCH 1 (NCT02034513); SWITCH 2 (NCT02030600).

Funding: Novo Nordisk, Søborg, Denmark.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6167291PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0478-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

glargine u100
20
type diabetes
20
diabetes mellitus
20
type type
12
type
10
insulin degludec
8
insulin glargine
8
u100 type
8
assess cost-effectiveness
8
type switch
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Insulin icodec is a basal insulin designed for once-weekly administration. This study assessed the pharmacological properties of icodec in Japanese individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Materials And Methods: In a randomized, open-label, crossover study, 24 Japanese individuals with T1D (20-64 years; glycated hemoglobin ≤9.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aims: In the HypoDeg trial, a randomised crossover trial in people with type 1 diabetes prone to nocturnal severe hypoglycaemia, treatment with insulin degludec (IDeg) resulted in significantly reduced rates of nocturnal symptomatic hypoglycaemia and all-day severe hypoglycaemia compared to insulin glargine U100 (IGlar). We analysed HypoDeg data at a single-patient level to assess the proportion of participants to whom the overall result applied.

Methods: Post hoc analysis using single-patient data (n = 133) on nocturnal symptomatic hypoglycaemia, all-day severe hypoglycaemia and HbA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Diabetic kidney disease populations are categorized as high risk for fasting in Ramadan due to various potential fasting-related complications. Insulin analogues are recommended to be used in place of human insulin during fasting, as they carry a lower risk of hypoglycaemia and stable glycaemic variability. A paucity of data exits on the safety and efficacy of different basal insulin types during fasting for this population.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The impacts of insulin degludec U100 (Deg-100) and insulin glargine U300 (Gla-300) on glycemic variability (GV) in patients with type 1 diabetes, as well as the impact of major nutrient components on GV in these patients, remain unclear. This was an observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study. Type 1 diabetes mellitus patients treated with either Deg-100 or Gla-300 as basal insulin were enrolled.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Glycemia reduction in type 2 diabetes-Hypoglycemia outcomes: A randomized clinical trial.

PLoS One

November 2024

Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Milken Institute of Public Health, The Biostatistics Center, The George Washington University, Rockville, MD, United States of America.

Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to compare the risk of hypoglycemia among type 2 diabetes patients on metformin and adding one of four common therapies: glargine, glimepiride, liraglutide, or sitagliptin.
  • The trial included 5,047 participants, assessing severe hypoglycemia events and symptoms over an average of 5 years, with a per-protocol analysis of 4,830 who completed follow-ups.
  • Results showed that glimepiride had the highest incidence of severe hypoglycemia (1.3%), while liraglutide and sitagliptin had the lowest risks, indicating varying hypoglycemia likelihood based on the second medication added
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!