A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The influence of trait empathy on reactive aggression: An ERP study. | LitMetric

This study mainly investigated the electrophysiological mechanism underlying the effect of trait empathy on reactive aggression using event-related potentials (ERPs). Firstly, we computed the correlation between trait empathy and trait aggression in 413 male undergraduates. The trait empathy was positively correlated with trait aggression, whereas the perspective taking (cognitive empathy) and the empathic concern (affective empathy) dimensions of trait empathy were negatively correlated with physical aggression. Subsequently, we selected 50 young male undergraduates respectively with high empathy (25) and low empathy (25) to complete a competitive reaction time task (a modified version of the Taylor Aggression Paradigm) against two mock opponents in high and low provocation conditions. The high empathy group selected lower average punishments against their opponents than the low empathy group. In the decision phase, high provocation elicited an enlarged ERP negativity compared to low provocation in the high empathy group. This observation was absent in the low empathy group. In the outcome phase, a feedback related negativity was observed in both groups. The low empathy group, but not the high empathy group, showed a significant average amplitude difference for losing and winning trials. The lack of a difference in ERP negativity amplitude in high empathy group suggests that punishing and being punished by opponents have a similar negative valence for this group.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.08.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

empathy group
28
trait empathy
20
high empathy
20
empathy
16
low empathy
16
empathy reactive
8
reactive aggression
8
trait aggression
8
male undergraduates
8
low provocation
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!